ShareThis Page
Penn State

Reviving pass rush key for Penn State in Fiesta Bowl against Washington

| Thursday, Dec. 28, 2017, 8:57 p.m.

SCOTTSDALE, Ariz. — Penn State struggled at times this season, notably in games against Ohio State and Michigan State, pressuring quarterbacks who can scramble. Washington's Jake Browning, a 2016 Heisman candidate, will present similar challenges in the Fiesta Bowl on Saturday.

As a result, Penn State defensive coordinator Brent Pry has re-examined his team's pass rush and how to make it more effective.

“I hope we've learned from those two experiences,” Pry said of the Ohio State and Michigan State games. “When you put on the film of the Washington quarterback, he is spinning and juking and jiving all over the place, and then he'll complete the pass.

“We worked very hard on caging quarterbacks like this, coming out of the midseason losses. We have to bounce guys around, win more one-on-ones and have a little better plan.”

Pry also brought up Penn State's lack of pass rush against Sam Darnold in the Rose Bowl last year. The Lions did not sack Darnold, allowing the quarterback time to throw for 453 yards and dissect the secondary in the second half.

Browning, who has thrown for nearly 9,000 career yards, has the extra skill of elusiveness. The quarterback rushed for 188 yards (40 net because of 16 sacks) and six touchdowns, something Penn State's defense understands it has to corral.

“That's what we've been talking about, trying to make sure we cage him in the pass rush,” defensive tackle Parker Cothren said. “Don't let him spin out and extend the play like he does very well.”

Penn State's defensive backs will be looking for some help with “caging” Browning to deflect some of their lengthy coverage needs.

“Him getting outside of contain and us collapsing the pocket will be a good challenge for us because you never know; we could end up covering for eight, 10 seconds,” cornerback Grant Haley said. “It's a challenge for us and it's a challenge for the defensive line.”

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.

click me