ShareThis Page
Penn State

James Franklin concedes Penn State tired out in loss to Ohio State

Jerry DiPaola
| Tuesday, Oct. 2, 2018, 6:36 p.m.
Ohio State’s J.K. Dobbins runs in for a touchdown against Penn State during the first half Saturday, Sept. 29, 2018, in University Park.
Ohio State’s J.K. Dobbins runs in for a touchdown against Penn State during the first half Saturday, Sept. 29, 2018, in University Park.

Penn State players “wore down” in the fourth quarter of Saturday’s 27-26 loss to Ohio State, a defeat that ultimately could keep the Nittany Lions out of the College Football Playoff.

That’s not an opinion of an unhappy fan or someone from an opposing school looking for a chink in Penn State’s armor. It’s a statement of fact from someone who knows Penn State’s team better than anyone: coach James Franklin.

I think, No. 1, we played our first-teamers at a much higher rep count than we have the previous games,” Franklin said Tuesday on the Big Ten coaches conference call. “I think that put us in the position we were in (ahead 26-14 with less than eight minutes to play).

“But I also think that we ran out of gas a little bit in the fourth quarter. (The Buckeyes) got great players, and they got great depth and they’ve had that for a number of years. And I do think that, come the fourth quarter, we had guys play a lot more reps than they’ve ever played and we started to wear down and that showed.”

No. 11 Penn State (4-1, 1-1 Big Ten) is in the middle of its off week — it won’t play again until Oct. 13 against Michigan State at Beaver Stadium — but Franklin promises it will be as busy as any during the season. Players and coaches will be looking back at the first five games and ahead to their quest to catch No. 3 Ohio State and No. 15 Michigan in the Big Ten East.

“Obviously, we didn’t do enough to win the game,” Franklin said. “And we look at all those things in great detail, and we’re going to go back and do all our self-studies and where our tendencies are, and areas that we still need to improve. And then, also obviously, getting a head start on Michigan State and balancing recruiting with that, as well.

“This is painful, and it hurts. But I do think that, when used the right way, this can fuel us to continue to grow and continue to take that next step.”

Franklin said he has seen many positive steps from his team since the 45-38 overtime victory against former Football Championship Subdivision member Appalachian State in the opener.

“What I’m always looking at is: Have we improved every single week?” he said. “And I can’t imagine there’d be anybody out there that follows Penn State closely that doesn’t feel like we have improved every single week, from App State all the way to Ohio State. I think we did that.”

Since defeating Appalachian State, a team that won its next three games by a combined margin of 169-23, Penn State recorded decisive victories against Pitt, Kent State and Illinois. The Nittany Lions won those games 177-40.

Helping to lead the team to its fast start is former Woodland Hills star running back Miles Sanders, who is second in the Big Ten and 12th in the nation in rushing yards with 538 for an average of 6.2 per carry.

“We think he’s playing at a really high level,” Franklin said, noting Sanders often gets extra yardage after first contact. “He’s growing and he’s evolving, and he’s getting more comfortable in his leadership role. And we’re very pleased with him.

“We think Miles is one of the best running backs in the country.”

Jerry DiPaola is a Tribune-Review staff writer. You can contact Jerry at or via Twitter @JDiPaola_Trib.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.

click me