ShareThis Page
Penn State

Miles Sanders, Penn State staying positive with run game

| Wednesday, Nov. 7, 2018, 6:39 p.m.
Penn State running back Miles Sanders has been limited to less than 4 yards per carry in the past two games.
Penn State running back Miles Sanders has been limited to less than 4 yards per carry in the past two games.

Miles Sanders and the Penn State running backs walked over to the offensive line room Sunday with a message: We’re going to get through this.

Confidence has not exactly been soaring these last few weeks, with Sanders (Woodland Hills) failing to crack 100 yards the last three games and the Nittany Lions winning just two of the last five. The offensive line has appeared to regress in some ways, so Sanders and Co. decided the line needed a pick-me-up.

“We don’t normally talk to them,” Sanders said Wednesday, referring to crashing position meetings. “But with us struggling and with the run game being a little frustrating, we thought just as running backs, just to talk to the room and tell them we still trust them and we still appreciate them and all that.

“I can’t even put into words how much I appreciate them, but we just have to get it going again and have that confidence back and have that mentality to run the ball like we did in the beginning.”

Sanders rushed for 162 yards against Michigan State nearly a month ago. But since then, the running game has sputtered. Quarterbacks Trace McSorley and Tommy Stevens have led the team in rushing in the last three games, and Penn State’s running backs have struggled to find a spark.

Sanders failed to crack 4 yards a carry in back-to-back games, the first time that’s happened all season.

“We just told them that we’re struggling with the running game right now, but we’re still going to get through it,” Sanders said. “We just got to play confident, play physical, do our jobs and then we will be able to run the ball this weekend.”

The junior and the fellow running backs asked their position coach Sunday if they could pop in on their OL teammates’ meeting. They knocked on the unit’s door, asked if they could say a few words, and offensive line coach Matt Limegrover gave them the floor.

Sanders said he did most of the talking, but fifth-year senior Johnathan Thomas also added a bit to the pep talk. Redshirt freshman Journey Brown and true freshman Ricky Slade also contributed.

The surprise meeting, with Limegrover in the room, appeared to go over well.

“I think they appreciated it,” Sanders said. “All I saw was a lot of smiles on their faces. It looked like they appreciated us coming in, just knowing I don’t ever want them to think we’re giving up on them and stuff. It’s hard. It’s football and stuff happens, and we just wanted to let them know that we got their back, and we’re in this together, and that we will get the running game back on track this weekend.”

The Nittany Lions will certainly have an opportunity Saturday. Wisconsin’s run defense isn’t what the Big Ten has become accustomed to: The Badgers rank No. 61 nationally in run defense, allowing 4.69 yards per carry and nearly 160 yards per game.

Statistically, based on yards allowed per attempt, that makes Wisconsin the second-worst run defense the Nittany Lions have faced all season. Only Illinois (5.74 ypc) has allowed more.

“We just showed them that we got their back and that we’re going to run the ball whenever want this weekend,” Sanders said. “That’s our mentality.”

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.

click me