ShareThis Page
Pitt

Miami bounces Pitt women from ACC Tournament, ends Panthers' season

| Thursday, March 3, 2016, 3:51 p.m.

GREENSBORO, N.C. — The end came early, in a loud arena filled with screaming elementary school kids on field trips to the ACC Tournament.

Miami was bigger. Miami was stronger. Miami was faster.

Young Pitt played well and still lost handily.

Adrienne Motley scored 19 points, and 6-foot-1 forward Keyona Hayes finished with 18 points and seven rebounds to lead fifth-seeded Miami to a 77-55 victory over 12th-seeded Pitt in a second-round game Thursday at Greensboro Coliseum.

“Pitt is a very, very nice team,” Miami coach Katie Meier said. “But I don't think physically — their physicality inside — well, we kind of dominated there.”

A day after three Panthers players put up double-doubles against North Carolina, Pitt (13-18) got pushed around inside. Miami (23-7) finished with a 33-23 rebounding advantage and outscored Pitt, 40-18, in the paint.

“They were very tough,” Pitt sophomore Yacine Diop said. “They were very physical, and we just didn't match their physicality. That made a big difference in this game.”

Diop (Seton-La Salle) and 6-foot freshman Brenna Wise (Vincentian) scored 17 points apiece to lead the Panthers. Wise, the ACC's seventh-best rebounder, got just six against a parade of big, strong Miami post players.

“(Miami) had an inside and outside presence,” Wise said, “so you're fighting on both the perimeter and inside. We've just got to work more inside. And hit the weight room.”

Hayes, in particular, gave Pitt fits. She shot 9 for 9 from the floor in 27 minutes. She is 16 for 16 in two games against Pitt this season.

“It's just focus,” Hayes said. “There's nothing really to explain. The team ran plays for me, and I came through for them. They put me in the right positions to make plays.”

Pitt kept the game close early, and Aysia Bugg's 3-pointer in the second quarter cut the lead to 20-17.

Miami went on an 18-2 run during the next six minutes, and Pitt never recovered. The Hurricanes led by at least 13 points the rest of the way.

“We knew coming in the challenges we faced against Miami,” Pitt coach Suzie McConnell-Serio said. “They have so many weapons, so many scorers on the floor. They play at a high pace with full-court pressure, disrupting what you try to do. We had to be efficient, and they took us out of our rhythm early.”

The Panthers played man-to-man, 2-3 and 3-2 matchup zone defenses, swapping defenders between Miami's scorers. It didn't matter. The Hurricanes hit nine of their first 13 shots and finished shooting 60 percent.

Jeff Mills is a freelance writer.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.

click me