ShareThis Page

Five storylines for Pitt vs. Rice: Perhaps right opponent at right time for Panthers

Jerry DiPaola
| Friday, Sept. 29, 2017, 7:24 p.m.
Pitt  quarterback Max Browne walks off the field with his head down after not getting a third down conversion against Oklahoma State in the first half Saturday, Sept. 16, 2017 at Heinz Field.
Chaz Palla
Pitt quarterback Max Browne walks off the field with his head down after not getting a third down conversion against Oklahoma State in the first half Saturday, Sept. 16, 2017 at Heinz Field.

Pitt finally will play a team with a losing record when Rice (1-3) of Conference USA visits Heinz Field on Saturday.

Pitt is 1-3 after losing to No. 4 Penn State (4-0), No. 14 Oklahoma State (3-1) and Georgia Tech (2-1). Even the FCS's Youngstown State, the only team Pitt has defeated, is 2-1.

Pitt has played Rice twice all-time, but not many people connected to the program were alive to see those games. Rice won both, 14-7 and 21-13, in 1950 and 1951.

Over the past four seasons, Pitt is 3-0 against Conference USA teams.

Here are five storylines to watch:

Does Pitt have a quarterback it can trust?

There's been no sign of that, which is a bad sign.

Coach Pat Narduzzi's last look at Ben DiNucci in the Georgia Tech game was a fumbled handoff recovered by the defense. That was the sixth series without a first down, all run by DiNucci.

The last look at Max Browne was unimpressive, but not bad. He completed 10 of 14 passes for 88 yards — in garbage time with Pitt trailing 35-17 and Georgia Tech's defense largely uninterested. But he was smooth and mistake-free.

Don't be surprised if Narduzzi goes back to Browne, but he'll need a line that doesn't get pushed into the backfield, receivers who can get open and backs who hit the right hole.

Neither quarterback has had that luxury on a consistent basis.

Does Pitt have an offensive line it can trust?

Again, no. But maybe there's a solution.

Find five guys and stick with them. Here's a suggestion, left to right: Brian O'Neill, Alex Officer, Jimmy Morrissey, Brandon Hodges and Alex Bookser.

It's hard to believe Bookser isn't the team's best tackle (after O'Neill). And it's equally hard to believe Hodges isn't the best fit at right guard when Bookser's at tackle.

The line is the biggest disappointment of the first four games, which is surprising considering it can't use youth as an excuse.

Will players start questioning themselves?

We have been told for weeks this team has strong fiber, good character and a hunger for championships. But it also has a three-game losing streak.

The last time that happened to Pitt, former coach Paul Chryst couldn't keep it together and it lost four of its last six games.

This is Narduzzi's first bout with adversity. If his players are tough enough to win that battle, can their coach keep them that way over eight games?

A bad Rice team is not a good test, but beating the three-touchdown point spread would be a nice optic.

The defense needs to gain confidence

Rice might have come along at the right time. The injury-riddled Owls have scored seven, three and seven points in their losses and are 118th among 129 FBS teams in total offense (292 yards per game).

The return of safety Jordan Whitehead gives Pitt a player offenses can respect. There seems to be some buzz about a Whitehead/Damar Hamlin safety tandem that has athleticism and on-field savvy in abundance. They won't be able to prove it against Rice, but it's a start.

Running backs need to make an impact

There was a lot of talk in training camp about Qadree Ollison, Chawntez Moss and Darrin Hall, but together they are averaging 3.8 yards per carry.

Help is on the way. Fullback George Aston is drawing glowing reviews for his quick recovery from a lower-extremity injury, and he'll be given a chance to jump-start the offense against Rice.

Where would Pitt have been last season without Aston's 10 touchdowns, scored in a variety of ways? Without Aston, former offensive coordinator Matt Canada might still be here.

Jerry DiPaola is a Tribune-Review staff writer. Reach him at or via Twitter @JDiPaola_Trib.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.

click me