ShareThis Page

Pitt notebook: Panthers get varied returns from injured players

Jerry DiPaola
| Thursday, Nov. 9, 2017, 9:42 p.m.
Pitt's Ben DiNucci runs for a 31-yard gain at the end of the second quarter against North Carolina on Nov. 9, 2017.
Getty Images
Pitt's Ben DiNucci runs for a 31-yard gain at the end of the second quarter against North Carolina on Nov. 9, 2017.

There was hope that Pitt's defense would get help from the return of cornerback Avonte Maddox, defensive tackle Keyshon Camp and defensive end Dewayne Hendrix.

All three missed the Virginia game Oct. 28 with injuries.

Camp and Hendrix returned Thursday, even though they didn't start during Pitt's game against North Carolina at Heinz Field. Maddox did not play in the first half.

Camp entered before the end of the first quarter and played much of the first half that ended with Pitt trailing 24-17. Redshirt freshman Rashad Wheeler also was part of the rotation at defensive tackle.

Coach Pat Narduzzi's decision to give Maddox's right arm injury more time to heal was based on his trust in backup cornerbacks Phillipie Motley and Jason Pinnock.

The third guy

North Carolina has used three quarterbacks this season, but coach Larry Fedora's choice to start the game was sophomore Nathan Elliott, the least utilized of the group.

Elliott completed four passes on North Carolina's first touchdown drive, one-fourth of his season total before the game.

Steelers/NFL presence

Among those in attendance Thursday was Steelers rookie wide receiver JuJu Smith-Shuster, who mugged for the scoreboard camera with students in the Panther Pitt.

There was a further — and more significant — pro presence in the form of 19 NFL scouts from 14 teams, including former Steelers director of football operations Tom Donahoe (now with the Philadelphia Eagles) and Minnesota Vikings general manager Rick Spielman.

General manager Kevin Colbert represented the Steelers.

Jerry DiPaola is a Tribune-Review staff writer. Reach him at or via Twitter @JDiPaola_Trib.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.

click me