ShareThis Page

Kevin Gorman: Early signing period arrives, just too late

Kevin Gorman
| Wednesday, Dec. 20, 2017, 9:30 p.m.
Pitt head football coach Pat Narduzzi speaks to the media about his first early signing class  Wednesday, Dec. 20, 2017, at UPMC Rooney Sports Complex.
Chaz Palla | Tribune-Review
Pitt head football coach Pat Narduzzi speaks to the media about his first early signing class Wednesday, Dec. 20, 2017, at UPMC Rooney Sports Complex.

Signing day came 50 days earlier than usual for most major college football programs but almost 14 years too late for one.

It's impossible to forget how devastated Walt Harris was Feb. 4, 2004, when five top recruits signed elsewhere. National recruiting analyst Tom Lemming said “that class might have cost Walt Harris his job” at Pitt.

That day, Harris advocated for an early signing period. It arrived Wednesday, five Panthers coaches later.

“I thought it was a logical idea, to make it better for the high school student-athletes,” Harris said. “They're doing two jobs: getting recruited and being student-athletes. That's a lot.

“It takes the pressure off the young people who are being recruited so hard. If they have a place they know they want to go, it's better to get it over with and enjoy their senior year instead of getting bombarded by colleges. Coaches can isolate on the ones still hanging. They're going to get a lot of attention. It's going to get intense.”

The inaugural early signing day was largely a success for regional schools like Pitt, Penn State and West Virginia. All three signed the majority of their committed prospects, even though none of them scored the top prize. Pine-Richland All-America quarterback Phil Jurkovec kept his word and signed with Notre Dame.

The early signing period scares Pitt coach Pat Narduzzi, who talked about his fears that the process will be sped up instead of solving the problems.

“These are hard decisions, even for guys that it was easy,” Narduzzi said. “I talked to one that said, ‘My mom was sweating this morning.' It's not easy. You feel like you're signing a scholarship, but you feel like you're signing your son away when a parent puts a signature down there — and you'd better be signing him to the right people.”

Whether the same people they signed with, especially the assistant coaches who do the heavy lifting on recruiting, will be at the same school by the second signing period in February is a mystery.

Signing day is supposed to mark the end of the recruiting process, but instead it could be the start of a frenzy for those who haven't signed.

“I worry a little about the second signing period because there are a few guys and a bunch of schools that want those few guys,” Penn State coach James Franklin said. “In the past, those schools were trying to chase 20 guys, and now you're going to have 20 schools chasing one guy.

“It's going to get interesting.”

West Virginia coach Dana Holgorsen admitted to being angry after signing day in years past because of recruiting losses.

“We never try to win signing day,” Holgorsen said. “There are a lot of programs out there that just try and win that day, and they are not even coaching anymore.”

In that sense, Penn State was the big winner. Where the Nittany Lions signed a top-three class that was filled with four- and five-star prospects, Pitt's class didn't have one.

But you can't claim victory until after the class comes through. In '04, Harris lost top-100 recruits Anthony Morelli, Andrew Johnson and James Bryant, but the Panthers signed All-Big East performers Josh Cummings, Derek Kinder, Adam Gunn, Scott McKillop and Darrelle Revis and a future NFL back in Rashad Jennings.

Had Harris signed everyone who committed, Pitt could have competed for a national championship. Instead, the program was dealt a blow at a time when the ACC was raiding the Big East and his job security was in question. Hindsight, as Harris once proclaimed, is 50-50.

Sorry, but an early signing day doesn't solve that. Recruiting is about to get interesting. And intense.

Kevin Gorman is a Tribune-Review staff writer. Reach him at or via Twitter at KGorman_Trib.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.

click me