ShareThis Page

Pitt defensive assistant Renaldo Hill leaving for job with Dolphins

Jerry DiPaola
| Thursday, Feb. 8, 2018, 12:09 p.m.

More change is coming to Pitt's defensive coaching staff.

Renaldo Hill, who has coached Pat Narduzzi's secondary for the past three seasons, is leaving for a position with the Miami Dolphins. Narduzzi confirmed the news on his Twitter account.

Hill, 39, played defensive back in the NFL for 11 seasons with the Arizona Cardinals, Oakland Raiders, Dolphins and Denver Broncos before accepting his first coaching position as a graduate assistant and cornerbacks coach at Wyoming. He was hired to Narduzzi's first Pitt staff in 2015.

Hill is leaving Pitt's staff at a critical time for the secondary, considering the losses of safety Jordan Whitehead and cornerback Avonte Maddox to opportunities in the NFL. The development of several young defensive backs, including highly touted WPIAL safeties Damar Hamlin, Bricen Garner and Paris Ford and cornerbacks Dane Jackson and Therran Coleman, will be key to the defense's success this season.

Last week, Narduzzi hired Archie Collins, who coached the secondary at Central Michigan the past five seasons. At the time, Narduzzi did not specify Collins' responsibilities. Also, Randy Bates was named defensive coordinator to replace Josh Conklin, who took a job as head coach at Wofford (S.C.) College.

Narduzzi also hasn't named a replacement for former offensive line coach John Peterson, who isn't returning after three seasons at Pitt.

Jerry DiPaola is a Tribune-Review staff writer. Reach him at or via Twitter @JDiPaola_Trib.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.

click me