ShareThis Page

Pitt basketball gameday: vs. Louisville, Feb. 11, 2018

Jerry DiPaola
| Saturday, Feb. 10, 2018, 7:51 p.m.
Pitt's Terrell Brown blocks the shot of Syracuse's Oshae Brissett in the second half Saturday, Jan. 27, 2018 at Petersen Events Center.
Chaz Palla | Tribune-Review
Pitt's Terrell Brown blocks the shot of Syracuse's Oshae Brissett in the second half Saturday, Jan. 27, 2018 at Petersen Events Center.

vs. Louisville

1 p.m., Petersen Events Center

TV/radio: WTAE-4, WATM-23/93.7 FM, Pitt Radio Network

Line: Louisville by 11

Breakdown: Pitt's freshmen scored 39 points in the first meeting with Louisville, a 77-51 road loss Jan. 2. Parker Stewart scored 12, Marcus Carr 11 and Shamiel Stevenson 10. ... Center Terrell Brown scored 18 points with eight rebounds and two blocks in a 72-48 loss to Clemson on Thursday. ... Louisville lost four of its past six games but defeated Georgia Tech on Thursday, 77-54.

Louisville (17-8, 7-5)

Position Player, Height, Class, PPG, RPG

F Anas Mahmoud, 7-0, Sr., 7.8, 5.7

F Ray Spalding, 6-10, Jr., 11.6, 9.0

F V.J. King, 6-6, So., 9.0, 3.4

G Quentin Snider, 6-2, Sr., 12.1, 2.8

G Darius Perry, 6-2, Fr., 3.3, 1.1

Pitt (8-17, 0-12)

Position Player, Height, Class, PPG, RPG

G/F Jared Wilson-Frame, 6-5, Jr., 12.8, 3.6

G Parker Stewart, 6-5, Fr., 8.2, 3.1

G Marcus Carr, 6-1, Fr., 10.7, 2.7

C Terrell Brown, 6-10, Fr., 4.3, 3.1

G Khameron Davis, 6-4, Fr., 4.7, 2.9

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.

click me