ShareThis Page

Duquesne's Smith, Williams earn Atlantic 10 honors

Jerry DiPaola
| Tuesday, March 6, 2018, 3:42 p.m.
Duquesne's Tarin Smith drives past VCU's Malik Crowfield during the first half Wednesday, Jan. 4, 2017, at Palumbo Center.
Christopher Horner | Tribune-Review
Duquesne's Tarin Smith drives past VCU's Malik Crowfield during the first half Wednesday, Jan. 4, 2017, at Palumbo Center.

Duquesne's Tarin Smith started all 32 games last season, so you might think starting only four this season would be problem for him.

Not so.

Smith has scored 20 or more points four times off the benc1h to average 12.5 per game, four more than last season. And he was rewarded Tuesday for his work in a reserve role when he was named the Atlantic 10 Sixth Man of the Year.

“Whatever the team needed,” Smith said. “It wasn't anything I did. (Coach Keith Dambrot) wanted to have some spark off the bench. I adapted to the role pretty good.”

Smith is just the second player in school history to win the sixth man award, joining Kevin Forney (2003).

Also, freshman Eric Williams Jr., the Dukes' leading scorer (14.5) and rebounder (8.9), was named to the conference's All-Rookie team.

Smith entered this season with 21 3-pointers, but he has 39 in 31 games while his 3-point percentage jumped from .212 to .342.

Williams Jr., a four-time A-10 Rookie of the Week, has recorded a school freshman record-tying 11 double-doubles and holds the Duquesne freshman mark for 3-pointers (66).

He is attempting to become the second freshman in school history to lead the team in scoring and rebounding, joining Wayne Smith (16.6, 6.2, 1998-99).

Williams Jr. ranks fourth on Duquesne's freshman total points list (450) and needs 17 to pass record holder Smith (466 in 1999). His 276 rebounds are 15 short of passing Dick Ricketts (290 in 1952) for most by a freshman in school history.

Jerry DiPaola is a Tribune-Review staff writer. Reach him at or via Twitter @JDiPaola_Trib.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.

click me