ShareThis Page

Pitt's Paris Ford happy to be practicing, OK with move to cornerback

Chris Adamski
| Monday, March 12, 2018, 6:15 p.m.

Pitt fans have been waiting a long time for former prized recruit Paris Ford to take the practice field eligible and part of the two-deep at safety.

That didn't happen when spring drills opened Monday, but only because of a technicality. Ford was present. He's cleared to play, and by all indications, he will be a big part of the first-team defense this spring.

But instead of playing at safety, Ford was at cornerback.

"I am just going to go out there and doing whatever the coaches tell me to play," said Ford, a Munhall native and the highest-rated member of Pitt's 2017 recruiting class. "Whatever will help the team win, I am down to do.

"It doesn't really matter what position I am at, just as long as I am playing and on the field, I am happy."

Ford made his coaches and teammates happy by making what new secondary coach Archie Collins said were "two or three" interceptions in practice.

"I tell you what: If you've got the ability to play corner and safety, it tells the amount of athleticism that you have," Collins said. "That's the first and foremost thing. With him being such a great athlete, he's going to play both positions. We're working him out (cornerback) currently right now, but he can possibly go back to safety."

To accomodate Ford's move, redshirt sophomore Therran Coleman (Brashear) was moved from cornerback to free safety.

"Trying to get your best 11 on the field," coach Pat Narduzzi said. "I don't think there's anything to it. Paris could go back and be a safety in a second. Therran can go back and be a corner. It's kind of, 'Where do we want to start?' All four of those guys back there, corners and safeties, should know every one of those spots."

Chris Adamski is a Tribune-Review staff writer. Reach him at or via Twitter @C_AdamskiTrib.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.

click me