ShareThis Page

McKayla Taylor's walk-off grand slam leads Pitt into ACC softball semifinals

Jerry DiPaola
| Thursday, May 10, 2018, 11:04 p.m.

The ball sailed off McKayla Taylor's bat and over the right-field wall. But coach Holly Aprile doesn't remember much more than that about the most dramatic at-bat in Pitt softball history.

Only this: Taylor's walk-off grand slam carried No. 2 seed Pitt to a 6-4 victory against Virginia Tech on Thursday in the quarterfinals of the ACC Tournament. The Panthers (32-17) will play No. 3 North Carolina in the semifinals at 3:30 p.m. Friday at Mewborn Field in Atlanta.

"I don't even remember what happened on McKayla's hit," Aprile said. "I was just euphoric to tell you the truth. It was absolutely amazing."

Pitt opened the bottom of the seventh inning trailing, 4-1, but the rally started with back-to-back singles by junior Alexis Solak and sophomore Kaitlyn Kruger. A one-out walk to junior Gabrielle Fredericks loaded the bases and senior Erin Hershman drew a full-count walk to trim Virginia Tech's lead to 4-2.

Taylor hit the next pitch over the wall.

"It was an amazing effort by our girls to figure it out there at the end," Aprile said. "We were struggling and working to make our adjustments at the plate, while our pitchers were battling.

"We couldn't get things going early on, but were able to put together an amazing performance in the final inning. The poise of our hitters was incredible."

Taylor's grand slam is the third of her career and second this season.

Jerry DiPaola is a Tribune-Review staff writer. Reach him at or via Twitter @JDiPaola_Trib.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.

click me