ShareThis Page
Pitt

Pitt wrestler Phillippi earns ACC honor

Paul Schofield
| Tuesday, Dec. 4, 2018, 11:15 p.m.

It hasn’t taken Micky Phillippi long to make noise for the Pitt wrestling team.

The 2017 Derry grad, a redshirt freshman, was named ACC Co-Wrestler of the Week on Tuesday.

Phillippi shared the honor with Virginia Tech’s Mekhi Lewis.

The Derry native earned a runner-up finish at 133 pounds at the 2018 Cliff Keen Las Vegas Invitational that included wins over friend and rival Luke Pletcher (Latrobe) of Ohio State. He transferred to Pitt from Virginia.

Phillippi entered the weekend seeded sixth and ranked 13 th by InterMat.

He began the round of 32 with a 16-6 major decision over Cal Poly’s Yoshito Funakoshi. He then faced No. 19 Cam Sykora of North Dakota State, a two-time NCAA qualifier, in the round of 16 where he won in a 6-2 decision.

In the quarterfinals, Phillippi defeated 2017 NCAA finalist and two-time All-American and No. 3 Ethan Lizak of Minnesota 4-0. In the semifinals, he outlasted Pletcher, 3-1. Pletcher, a returning All-American and two-time NCAA qualifier, was the No. 2 seed in the weight class and ranked fifth by InterMat.

In the championship finals, Phillippi faced the No. 1 seed and third-ranked Nick Suriano of Rutgers and fell 11-3.

Phillippi is now 6-1 on the year with four wins over ranked opponents.

Paul Schofield is a Tribune-Review staff writer. You can contact Paul at pschofield@tribweb.com or via Twitter @Schofield_Trib.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.

click me