ShareThis Page

Pitt softball awaits curtain call Friday in Charleston, S.C.

Jerry DiPaola
| Thursday, Feb. 7, 2019, 7:54 p.m.

The bar is set high for first-year Pitt softball coach Jodi Hermanek, whose team opens the season Friday with the first of five games at the Cougar Classic in Charleston, S.C.

Hermanek replaces Holly Aprile, who left for the same job at Louisville after leading Pitt (33-18-1) to its first ACC Coastal Division championship and school records in conference victories (16) and series wins (seven of eight). Pitt was the No. 2 seed in the ACC Tournament, reaching the title game before losing to eventual national champion Florida State, 5-4, on a walkoff home run.

A total of 15 players, eight of whom are seniors, return from that team. Senior Olivia Gray earned first-team All-ACC honors after hitting .311.

Picked to finish fourth in the ACC by the Preseason Coaches Poll, Pitt will play its first game at 6 p.m. Friday against Purdue, followed by games against the host team, College of Charleston, Central Michigan and two against Wichita State.

Overall, Pitt’s schedule includes nine NCAA Tournament teams from a year ago, including No. 6 Oregon, which advanced to the College World Series, and nine teams that are currently ranked or receiving votes in the ESPN/USA Softball Preseason Poll.

Hermanek, who previously coached for 14 years at Ohio and Southern Utah, is approaching her 400th career victory. She has a 397-376-1 record, including four NCAA Tournament appearances.

Jerry DiPaola is a Tribune-Review staff writer. You can contact Jerry at or via Twitter @JDiPaola_Trib.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.

click me