ShareThis Page
Pitt

Malik Ellison injured, won't play against N.C. State

Jerry DiPaola
| Saturday, Feb. 9, 2019, 1:36 p.m.
Syracuse’s Elijah Hughes fouls Pitt’s Malik Ellison in the firs half Saturday, Feb. 2, 2019 at Petersen Events Center.
Chaz Palla | Tribune-Review
Syracuse’s Elijah Hughes fouls Pitt’s Malik Ellison in the firs half Saturday, Feb. 2, 2019 at Petersen Events Center.

Pitt junior Malik Ellison, who came close to a double-double in each of the past two games, won’t play Saturday when the Panthers meet N.C. State at 2 p.m. at Petersen Events Center.

Pitt basketball’s Twitter account reported Ellison was hurt late in the overtime loss to Wake Forest on Tuesday night. He was on the floor in the last minute of the game.

Losing Ellison is a big blow to the young Panthers because he collected 11 rebounds and nine points against Syracuse on Feb. 2 and eight and eight at Wake Forest. He also has more collegiate experience than anyone on Pitt team’s with the exception of senior Jared Wilson-Frame.

The result is that Pitt (12-11, 2-8) will try to stop its six-game losing streak with only three players off the bench.

Ellison, a transfer from St. John’s, is averaging 19.9 minutes, 6.8 points and 3.9 rebounds through 23 games. He has started 16 of them.

Jerry DiPaola is a Tribune-Review staff writer. You can contact Jerry at jdipaola@tribweb.com or via Twitter @JDiPaola_Trib.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.

click me