ShareThis Page
Pitt

Pitt wrestlers upset No. 8 N.C. State, 18-16

Jerry DiPaola
| Sunday, Feb. 10, 2019, 5:39 p.m.

The Pitt wrestling team continued building momentum for the postseason, upsetting N.C. State, the No. 8 team in the nation, 18-16, Sunday in Raleigh, N.C. It was Pitt’s first victory against N.C. State since the teams first met in 2014 and the Panthers’ first in Raleigh.

Pitt improves to 11-3 overall and picks up its first ACC win of the year (1-2). NC State moves to 14-2 overall and 2-1 in conference action. The Wolfpack also suffer their first loss at home this year, finishing 9-1.

Redshirt sophomore Gregg Harvey (174 pounds), redshirt freshman Nino Bonaccorsi (184) and redshirt junior Kellan Stout (197) recorded upset victories against three N.C. State ranked opponents. Harvey, who is unranked, defeated No. 10 Daniel Bullard, 6-4; Bonaccorsi, ranked No. 13, beat No. 3 Nick Reenan, 8-0; and Stout, also unranked defeated No. 20 Malik McDonald, 5-4.

Also, No. 5 Micky Phillippi recorded a major decision against John Devine, 17-5, at 133 pounds to boost his record to 15-2.

“It was a great team win today,” Pitt coach Keith Gavin said. “Our guys wrestled with a lot of fight and passion. When you do that, things tend to go your way more often than not.”

Pitt trailed, 16-4, but victories by Harvey, Bonaccorsi, Stout and No. 14 Demetrius Thomas at 285 swept Pitt to victory. Thomas’ victory was the decisive bout as he beat Deonte Wilson by a major decision, 17-5.

Jerry DiPaola is a Tribune-Review staff writer. You can contact Jerry at jdipaola@tribweb.com or via Twitter @JDiPaola_Trib.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.

click me