ShareThis Page
Robert Morris

Robert Morris coach Toole likes recruiting class

Paul Schofield
| Thursday, May 14, 2015, 10:16 p.m.

Robert Morris coach Andy Toole was unsure how many scholarships he would offer midway through the 2014-15 season.

He thought about holding a couple back.

But with the somewhat surprising departure of Northeast Conference Rookie of the Year Marcquise Reed, the graduation of Lucky Jones and David Appolon and the transfer of three other players, Toole decided to go after six players to fill out his roster. Reed announced Monday he was transferring to Clemson.

“I like a lot of things about this class,” Toole said after the class was announced Thursday. “All six have a chance to compete for playing time, and all six have room for improvement. They still can become better players.”

Toole said losing Reed was not a total surprise. He said it happens a lot in college basketball, and coaches just hope it doesn't happen to them.

This year's class includes two early signings: the WPIAL's top shooting guard Matty McConnell of Chartiers Valley and versatile swingman Isaiah Still of Rahway, N.J.

He signed four more players the past two weeks: junior-college transfer forward Billy Giles of Allegany (Md.) and incoming freshman guards Steven Whitley of Norfolk, Va. and Jordan Lester of Sammamish, Wash., and forward Joe Hugley of Gaithersburg, Md.

“We sat down as a staff and identified some of our weaknesses, and I think we've addressed what our needs are,” Toole said.

Paul Schofield is a staff writer for Trib Total Media. Reach him at or via Twitter @Schofield_Trib.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.

click me