ShareThis Page

Big 12 commissioner feels good about conference despite negative perceptions

| Monday, July 17, 2017, 6:57 p.m.
Big 12 commissioner Bob Bowlsby shakes hands before speaking during the Big 12 media days Monday, July 17, 2017, at the Dallas Cowboys practice facilities in Frisco, Texas.
Big 12 commissioner Bob Bowlsby shakes hands before speaking during the Big 12 media days Monday, July 17, 2017, at the Dallas Cowboys practice facilities in Frisco, Texas.

FRISCO, Texas — The Big 12's decision to restore a football championship game was based only on the league wanting to boost its chances of getting a team into the College Football Playoff, commissioner Bob Bowlsby said Monday.

At the start of football media days, Bowlsby said he feels good about what the Big 12 is doing, and he defended the league against the idea it is among the weakest of the power five conferences.

“I think our perception is somewhat a product of not being in the playoff two of the three years. That's a really short window,” Bowlsby said. “It gets a little tiresome because I know we play at a very high level, and I know top to bottom we're the best in the country in terms of balance.”

Bowlsby touted the postseason success last season — the league was 4-2 in bowl games, including 10-time Big 12 champion Oklahoma's 35-19 win over Auburn in the Sugar Bowl. The Sooners were part of the CFP in 2015, the only Big 12 team so far to make it in the current “final four” format.

“Make no mistake, it's not about making the playoff,” Bowlsby said. “It's about winning national championships.”

Texas, one of three Big 12 teams with new head coaches this season, won the league's last national championship with Vince Young at quarterback during the 2005 season.

The Big 12 is the smallest of the power five conferences with 10 teams, and the only one to play a full round-robin schedule each season. It also was the only one without a conference championship game, which was added for the upcoming season after a six-season hiatus.

“The decision was made 100 percent based upon our ability to compete at the national level,” Bowlsby said. “We relied in large measure on our intuition and some data that we saw that indicated that playing a championship game and having that 13th data point would, in fact, deliver that advantage.”

Bowlsby said he doesn't recall finances of the title game ever being discussed, though it could generate another $30 million to the league that split a record $348 million among its teams for the 2016-17 academic year.

Without divisions in the Big 12, the championship game will match the top two teams from the regular season on the first weekend in December at the Dallas Cowboys' home stadium. The date isn't finalized, and could be played on a Friday or Saturday.

The 65-year-old Bowlsby, who recently marked his five-year anniversary as the Big 12 commissioner, said he expects to soon sign a contract extension that would take him through the 2024-25 academic year. That would also take him through the negotiations of the league's next media rights contract.

“I feel I'm a pretty young 65. I like what I'm doing,” Bowlsby said. “I plan on being here a while.”

Bowlsby took a moment during his opening comments to recognize Bob Stoops, who suddenly retired as Oklahoma's coach last month. Stoops won 10 Big 12 titles and a national championship in his 18 seasons with the Sooners.

“The Big 12 is poorer for not having Bob Stoops any longer as a head coach in our league,” Bowlsby said. “He was a tremendous influence on his staff, on his players, on his university over a very long period of time. His legacy is extraordinary.”

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.

click me