ShareThis Page
WVU

WVU senior Kwiatkoski ready to switch to original LB role

| Saturday, April 11, 2015, 10:24 p.m.
Mountaineers linebacker Nick Kwiatkoski (left) had 103 tackles last season and led the team in tackles for a loss last season.
Barry Reeger | Trib Total Media
Mountaineers linebacker Nick Kwiatkoski (left) had 103 tackles last season and led the team in tackles for a loss last season.

Whether called upon as “Sam,” “Mike” or “Will,” West Virginia redshirt senior Nick Kwiatkoski answers.

In his final time through spring practices, Kwiatkoski, a Bethel Park grad, has re-familiarized himself with the strong-side linebacker's responsibilities in the Mountaineers' 3-3-5 defense.

He led West Virginia in tackles as the starting middle linebacker in 2014 and earned second-team All-Big 12 Conference honors in 2013 as the weak-side starter.

But barring a drastic change in plans, Kwiatkoski will spend his final fall at the same position he occupied as a backup in 2012.

“With Sam, there's a little more coverage, but other than that, it's linebacker,” Kwiatkoski said. “At Mike, I kind of had to know all three of them. So, the transition has been smooth.”

Kwiatkowski's move came as no surprise to the Mountaineers with the return of redshirt senior Jared Barber to the lineup — the third-year starter sat out the 2014 season as he recovered from an ACL tear. Not even after he registered 103 tackles, including team-highs in solo stops (71) and tackles for a loss (11.5), did Kwiatkoski suspect he would remain the man in the middle.

“Coach called me up and asked if it was all right, and I said it was fine,” Kwiatkoski said. “I don't mind at all. I like Sam a lot. Jared played (in the middle) freshman year, so he kind of had it down.”

Fortunately for Kwiatkoski, there's stability in the defensive system, something the Mountaineers lacked before defensive coordinator and linebackers coach Tony Gibson arrived in 2014.

Gibson guided West Virginia as it went from 101st in total defense (445 ypg) in 2013 to 56th (388.6) a season ago.

There's considerable optimism that the Mountaineers, who lost just one starter on defense, will fare even better this fall.

Results from West Virginia's first public spring practice, held April 4 at Shepherd University, seemed to affirm as much — the first-team offense, starting at the opponent's 30-yard line, scored just once in six series against the starting defense.

“Our defense should be ahead right now,” coach Dana Holgorsen said. “For one, they've got 15 or 16 guys who have played a lot of football.

“Then just the nature of spring practice — defense is usually always ahead of the offense, and it should be that way. I'm satisfied with that.”

But the second public practice, held Saturday at Milan Puskar Stadium, set a different tone. Just hours after Holgorsen spoke with media, the first-team offense scored on its first play from scrimmage and moved the ball without much resistance throughout the session.

Gibson, critical of his defense after the performance, offered only praise when asked about Kwiatkoski.

“Those two kids, Barber and (Kwiatkoski), I think right now are playing as well anybody we have on our team,” Gibson said. “They're just solid players. They understand the scheme. They like playing physical and downhill, so they're a great fit for what we do.”

Of Kwiatkoski in particular, Gibson added: “He's going to be in space a lot more. He's not protected on both sides. He's adjusting to that, and really it goes back to where he started.”

And by started, Gibson meant high school, where Kwiatkoski — then 6-foot-1 and 200 pounds — played running back and safety for Bethel Park.

The mention of his days as a Black Hawk brought a smile to Kwiatkoski's face.

“I miss those days,” he said. “That was about 30 pounds ago.”

Bill West is a staff writer for Trib Total Media. Reach him at wwest@tribweb.com or via Twitter @BWest_Trib.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.

click me