ShareThis Page
Kevin Gorman

Kevin Gorman's Take 5: Five thoughts on Syracuse 60, Pitt 55

Kevin Gorman
| Saturday, Jan. 27, 2018, 6:09 p.m.
Pitt's Jared Wilson-Frame hits a shot against Syracuse in the first half Saturday, Jan. 27, 2018 at Petersen Events Center.
Chaz Palla | Tribune-Review
Pitt's Jared Wilson-Frame hits a shot against Syracuse in the first half Saturday, Jan. 27, 2018 at Petersen Events Center.

1. Pitt goes retro: After years of haggling over whether to go by Pitt or the University of Pittsburgh, changing Panthers logos and going from the block PITT back to the script Pitt, it's good to see the university embracing its classic uniforms.

Against Syracuse, the Panthers not only wore all-white uniforms with the old Pitt royal blue numbers and gold trim that invoked memories of their Fitzgerald Field House years.

They also paid tribute to the program's all-time greats by wearing shooting shirts with the names and numbers of Brian Shorter (00), Vonteego Cummings (3), Don Hennon (10), Steven Adams (12), Sam Clancy (15), Brandin Knight (20), Jason Matthews (22), Sam Young (23), Larry Harris (24), Ricardo Greer (25), Charles Smith (32), Aaron Gray (33), Billy Knight and Jerome Lane (34) and Clyde Vaughan (42).

2. Send it in, Jerome!: The coolest moment was Pitt celebrating the 30th anniversary this week of The Dunk, Lane's backboard-shattering tomahawk jam at Fitzgerald Field House.

During a timeout at the 13-minute, 39-second mark of the first half, Pitt showed the video highlight of Lane's dunk against Providence. When it ended, Lane was introduced to the crowd to a rousing ovation.

It was a great reminder of one of Pitt's greatest moments.

And a sad reminder of how far the program has fallen.

3. Streaky shooting: Pitt's Jared Wilson-Frame followed a season-high 22-point game against N.C. State with a strong start to the first half against the Orange.

The 6-foot-5, 220-pound junior swingman made 5 of his first 6 shots (including a pair of 3-pointers) in scoring 12 of Pitt's first 14 points, as the Panthers jumped to a 14-6 lead. Wilson-Frame added a free throw at 8:05 to extend it to 15-10.

Unfortunately, Wilson-Frame went 0 for 5, missing three 3s, the remainder of the first half.

4. Dealing with the drought: Pitt continued its streak of scoring droughts, this time going 8:55 between field goals to allow Syracuse turn a 14-6 deficit into a 17-15 lead.

The Panthers went from 13:39 until 4:44 without a basket, broken when Khameron Davis scored on an up-and-under layup to tie it at 17-17.

Pitt got zero points from its bench in the first half but also had two starters who went scoreless. Only three Panthers put up points in the first half, with Davis scoring four and Marcus Carr making an off-balance 3 with 0.8 seconds left to cut it to 22-20.

Then again, Syracuse did the same.

5. A new low: With the loss to Syracuse, Pitt fell to 0-9 in ACC play for its worst conference start ever.

The Panthers blew two chances this week to win home games against unranked opponents in blowing leads against N.C. State on Wednesday and Syracuse on Saturday.

The Panthers went 4-14 in the ACC last season with four seniors, so this shouldn't be totally unexpected given the high turnover and number of newcomers to the program. Pitt was picked to finish last, but their inability to win at the Pete was inconceivable not so long ago.

Kevin Gorman is a Tribune-Review staff writer. Reach him at or via Twitter @KGorman_Trib.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.

click me