ShareThis Page
Tim Benz

Tim Benz's Friday Football Footnotes: AFC North QB upheaval, Derrius Guice rumor and more

| Thursday, May 3, 2018, 8:35 p.m.
Louisville's Lamar Jackson poses with NFL Commissioner Roger Goodell after being picked No. 32 overall by the Ravens during the 2018 NFL Draft on April 26, 2018 in Arlington, Texas.
Getty Images
Louisville's Lamar Jackson poses with NFL Commissioner Roger Goodell after being picked No. 32 overall by the Ravens during the 2018 NFL Draft on April 26, 2018 in Arlington, Texas.

This week's "Friday Football Footnotes" takes a look at some of the other angles of the NFL Draft outside of Pittsburgh that may impact the Steelers and a weird rumor why so many teams passed on Derrius Guice.

AFC NORTH MAKES WAVES

The most intriguing story to emerge from the NFL Draft weekend is what happened in the AFC North, where three of the four teams took their quarterback of the future.

And the fourth apparently wanted to.

The Cleveland Browns and Baltimore Ravens drafted Baker Mayfield and Lamar Jackson in the first round. The Steelers selected Mason Rudolph in the third round.

In a fun twist, the Steelers did so right in front of the Cincinnati Bengals, who, based on what Marvin Lewis said after the draft, had at least some interest in Rudolph.

It's not often you see three teams within a division get ready to turn the page on the quarterback at the same time.

But we may see Mayfield this year in Cleveland, Jackson next year in Baltimore and Rudolph whenever the always-fickle Ben Roethlisberger makes up his mind about retirement.

That could be next year or — who knows — like, 2027.

If the second thing happens, maybe then we get a Black and Gold version of the Tom Brady/Jimmy Garoppolo story instead.

That will be fun for me. Which is truly all I care about.

How Cincy may have Retaliated

Last year, the Bengals drafted William Jackson III right before the Steelers were likely to take him.

This year, the Steelers apparently did that when they took Rudolph. Those quotes from Lewis after the draft sure made it sound like that's the case.

What's also going to be interesting is how Malik Jefferson does at linebacker for Cincinnati. That's a player who would've made sense in Pittsburgh as a potential Ryan Shazier replacement.

Some Steelers fans are livid that linebacker wasn't addressed in the draft. And if Jefferson succeeds while Rudolph sits as a backup, that will be a major talking point.

Looking at Lamar

The Ravens will be going from a notoriously immobile passer in Joe Flacco to potentially one of the best running quarterbacks we've seen in the NFL.

But will Jackson be able to throw the deep ball like Flacco, and how quick of a study will he be? Flacco started his tenure as Rookie of the Year in 2008.

Among the AFC North QB changes, Baltimore's will be most drastic in terms of personality. There's little structure or semblance of a system in place in Cleveland right now to begin with. And Rudolph looks like he'd be a Big Ben clone if he lives up to his draft billing.

The biggest mystery of the three will be in Maryland.

Control, Alt, Delete on Guice

Like many teams, the Steelers passed on LSU running back Derrius Guice in the first round. I thought they might target him as Le'Veon Bell insurance.

Something off the field happened that caused Guice to slide down the draft board into the second round. Benjamin Albright in Denver suggested all he wants to do is sit around and play video games.

When I saw that tweet, it was the second time I had heard that about Guice. Someone in Baton Rouge had previously told me that he's a huge gamer and really vocal about how important that hobby is to him.

The other items in that tweet are more alarming. But if the video game stuff is what his fall was all about, I gotta ask, THAT's it? A 20- year-old into video games too much?! Major headlines! Film at 11! I thought it was something nefarious. Drugs. Violence. Gang activity. Gimme something! But the kid's a video game addict? So what? Many kids are.

Did the video games get in the way of him tearing up the SEC? If that's what that draft-day slide was all about, the Washington Redskins got a steal.

Chark the Shark

Speaking of LSU guys and the Steelers, here's a natural comparison that's always going to happen.

The Steelers selected wide receiver James Washington at pick 60. I love that move. But I also am a big fan of LSU receiver D.J. Chark.

He was taken with the very next choice by the Jacksonville Jaguars.

Chark is bigger, has more footspeed and is considered to be more athletic. But Washington is deemed to be more consistent, stronger and with better hands.

These two teams play each other Nov. 18 and maybe again in the playoffs. If one receiver goes on to be great and the other busts, they'll always be linked.

Tim Benz is a Tribune-Review staff writer. Reach him at tbenz@tribweb.com or via Twitter @TimBenzPGH.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.

click me