Confidence, development of 3rd pitch helped QV grad Garbee reach pros |

Confidence, development of 3rd pitch helped QV grad Garbee reach pros

Mercyhurst Athletics
Recent Mercyhurst grad Tyler Garbee (Quaker Valley) got the call he had been drafted while playing in the NCAA Tournament.

Mercyhurst pitchers Tyler Garbee and Matthew Minnick paced in the dugout during the Lakers’ game against UC San Diego. Not surprising considering this was the Division II World Series and the Lakers were facing elimination with a loss.

But their anxiety had as much to do with an anticipated phone call as the outcome of the game. Garbee, a Quaker Valley graduate, and Minnick were expected to be taken in the MLB Draft.

Garbee — encouraged by coach Joe Spano to keep his phone handy — got his call in the second inning. He was taken in the 19th round by the Cincinnati Reds.

Minnick was taken four rounds later by the New York Yankees.

And Mercyhurst won the game.

“(Getting drafted) was a little bit of happiness and a lot of relief,” Garbee (6-foot-3, 200 pounds) said from Arizona, where he was awaiting his assignment to one of the Reds’ minor league clubs, “The relief came from finally hearing (my) name. The happiness came from getting the opportunity to keep playing.”

Garbee’s ride to the pro ranks wasn’t a smooth one. After making 14 appearances (two starts) for Pitt as a freshman, Garbee made only two appearances as a sophomore, prompting him to transfer.

“I think I was more discouraged about the lack of success I was having,” he said. “It was nothing anyone at Pitt did. I blame myself as much as anything. In ACC baseball, you just have to perform.”

Spano agreed, saying in the ACC, there is very little margin for error. But he preaches a different philosophy to his players.

“The things we do in our program help the players become themselves,” said Spano, who has had 12 players — most of them pitchers — drafted in his 21 seasons at Mercyhurst. “We just try to let them cut loose. Sometimes that goes a long way, being able to have some freedom.”

Garbee said he also received a boost during his two seasons in the Coastal Plains League, a wooden-bat league for college players based in North Carolina. There, his pitching coach preached the importance of confidence.

But perhaps the biggest difference-maker for Garbee was the development of a changeup. He relied heavily on his fastball and curve, but the changeup made his fastball more effective. He went from 73 strikeouts in 7113 innings as a junior to 110 strikeouts in 7413 innings this season.

He also added velocity to his fastball, which, Spano said, rests between 92 and 95 mph but has gone as high as 97.

“By the end of my junior year, I had all the confidence in (my changeup),” Garbee said. “It’s a big difference when you have three pitches.”

Added Spano: “At his age, the velocity is continuing to uptick, and scouts are interested to see how far that can go. I think he could have a chance to be a starter, but his real strength might be coming out of the pen.”

That journey begins now for Garbee. He got a taste of what life in the pros will be like while in Arizona, and he believes he can fit right in.

“I think confidence is a huge thing and believe you’re as good as the players here,” he said. “I was in the training room, and Hunter Greene, the No. 2 overall pick from (2017) was standing there doing rehab. I threw a bullpen today, and (Reds Hall of Fame shortstop) Barry Larkin was there.

“I was like, ‘I’m one of these guys now.’ ”

Chuck Curti is a Tribune-Review staff writer. You can contact Chuck by email at [email protected] or via Twitter .

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.