Countdown to camp: Evgeni Malkin among Penguins players with something to prove |

Countdown to camp: Evgeni Malkin among Penguins players with something to prove

Jonathan Bombulie
Chaz Palla | Tribune-Review
The Penguins’ Sidney Crosby joins in defending Evgeni Malkin during the first day of camp Friday, Sept. 14, 2018 at UPMC Lemieux Sports Complex.
Getty Images
UNIONDALE, NEW YORK - APRIL 10: Evgeni Malkin #71 of the Pittsburgh Penguins celebrates his second period goal against the New York Islanders in Game One of the Eastern Conference First Round during the 2019 NHL Stanley Cup Playoffs at NYCB Live’s Nassau Coliseum on April 10, 2019 in Uniondale, New York. (Photo by Bruce Bennett/Getty Images) The Penguins’ Evgeni Malkin had his lowest goal output for a full season, 21, in 2018-19.

As the Pittsburgh Penguins prepare to report to training camp Friday, Evgeni Malkin is wrapping up an offseason unlike any he’s had in his pro career.

That’s not because of the trade rumors that sprung up after the Penguins unceremoniously were dumped out of the first round of the playoffs by the New York Islanders in a four-game sweep.

Starting in 2008 — remember the rumored package of Mike Cammalleri and the second pick in the draft from the Kings? — Malkin has seen his name surface in trade chatter more summers than it hasn’t.

It’s because of the season he put together in 2018-19.

He scored only 21 goals, a career low for a full season, to go along with an unsightly minus-25 plus-minus rating.

If the Penguins are going to return to championship contention this season, the 33-year-old Malkin will have to prove last year wasn’t the beginning of an age-related decline and was merely a blip on the radar of an otherwise incredibly illustrious career.

With four days left until the start of camp, here’s a look at four players who will arrive in Cranberry with the most to prove.

1. Malkin

It’s important not to exaggerate Malkin’s downturn last season. He still had 72 points in 68 games. He had 34 even-strength assists, his best total since 2011-12. He remains one of the world’s most talented players.

His two-way game, however, took a huge hit. When he was on the ice at even strength, the Penguins were outscored 64-51. When he skated in overtime, the team was outscored 5-0. He was also on the ice for 12 short-handed goals against.

Malkin needs to prove he can clean up the messy parts of his game.

2. Matt Murray

A two-time Stanley Cup champion coming off a season that saw him rank 10th in the league among qualifying goaltenders with a .919 save percentage, Murray long since has shown he’s a high-end NHL puck stopper.

What he needs to prove this season is he should be paid like it.

Murray is entering the final year of a contract that pays him $3.75 million annually. He should easily double that figure in his next deal. Having a healthy, consistent season would help make it easier for the Penguins to write that check.

3. Patric Hornqvist

When Hornqvist managed three goals over the final 34 games of last season, it raised red flags. Had years of playing grueling, physical hockey and a history of concussions caught up to the 32-year-old winger?

He needs to prove he can shake off his slump and show the Penguins they won’t regret the five-year, $26.5 million contract they signed him to in 2018.

4. Erik Gudbranson

The task in front of Gudbranson is a simple one.

When he was on the ice with Vancouver last season, his team was outscored 66-31 at even strength. After a February trade, the Penguins outscored opponents 13-8 with Gudbranson on the ice.

The physical 27-year-old defender needs to prove he’s the player he looked like with the Penguins, not the one he looked like with the Canucks.

Jonathan Bombulie is a Tribune-Review assistant sports editor. You can contact Jonathan by email at [email protected] or via Twitter .

Categories: Sports | Penguins
TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.