David Bradshaw closing in on 4th title at Frank B. Fuhrer Invitational | TribLIVE.com
Other Local

David Bradshaw closing in on 4th title at Frank B. Fuhrer Invitational

Paul Schofield
Paul Schofield | Tribune-Review
David Bradshaw chips on No. 17 during the Frank B. Fuhrer Invitational on June 25, 2019, at Pittsburgh Field Club.
Paul Schofield | Tribune-Review
Jack Katarincic tees off at No. 18 during the Frank B. Fuhrer Invitational on June 25, 2019, at Pittsburgh Field Club.

Most golfers consider Round 3 of a tournament as moving day.

There wasn’t much movement, however, during Tuesday’s round at the annual Frank B. Fuhrer Jr. Invitational at Pittsburgh Field Club, and that was just fine for three-time champion David Bradshaw.

The Harper’s Ferry, W.Va., native, who competes on the McKenzie Tour in Canada, played his third consistent, under-par round by carding a 1-under 69.

He heads into Wednesday’s final round at 6-under 204.

Bradshaw holds a five-shot lead over Michigan native Ryan Lenahan, who shot an even-par 70 in the third round and is at 1-under 209 for the tournament.

The only player to gain on Bradshaw was Michael Gligac, who shot a 2-under 68. He is tied for ninth at 1-over 211.

Bradshaw put himself in great shape in 2012, ’15 and ’16, and placed second in ’13 and ’17 to Mike Van Sickle.

“I like this course. It fits my game,” Bradshaw said. “I think the greens here are made for lag putting. You can’t be too aggressive. You’re forced to get your putt close.”

Bradshaw’s round started with a bogey on No. 1. He rebounded with consecutive birdies on Nos. 7 and 8. He added the third birdie of his round on No. 11

After giving up a shot on No. 14, he carded a birdie on No. 16.

On No. 17, Bradshaw had a tricky 6-footer for par. His putt hung on the lip for nearly 10 seconds before falling.

“I could see it still moving,” Bradshaw said. “I knew it was going to fall, and it was well inside the time limit. It fell because of gravity, not the wind.”

When Bradshaw watched his putt stay on the edge, he let everyone know vocally that the ball was still moving.

He bogeyed the final hole, but still maintained a comfortable lead.

Lenahan said getting to play in the final paring Wednesday will be good because he will know where he stands on the leaderboard.

“I wish I was a little closer, but I’m in a good place,” Lenahan said. “I just have to play my best, and hopefully he doesn’t.”

Five golfers are tied for third at even par — defending champion Daniel McCarthy, Eric Cole, Washington native Steve Wheatcroft, Matt Schall and Pittsburgh Field Club member Jack Katarincic.

Penn-Trafford graduate Dan Obremski is tied for 11th at 3-over, and Franklin Regional graduate Palmer Jackson is tied for 14th at 4-over with Pittsburgh’s Beau Titsworth and Indiana’s Matt Holuta, among others.

Jackson had an up-and-down round Tuesday. He got hot on the back nine after he sank a 30-foot par putt on No. 12.

He followed with two consecutive birdies and a chip in for an eagle 3 on No. 15.

Among other notable scores, Van Sickle, a Pine-Richland graduate and former Fuhrer tournament champion, is tied for 24th (220). Central Catholic graduate Jimmy Meyers is tied for 27th (221). Irwin native Justin Moose is 32nd (225). Greensburg’s Mark Goetz is 33rd (227). Washington’s John Popeck is 35th (231); and Pittsburgh native Bob Friend is 36th (232).

Paul Schofield is a Tribune-Review staff writer. You can contact Paul by email at [email protected] or via Twitter .

Categories: Sports | Other Local
TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.