Steelers’ David DeCastro won’t play in Pro Bowl because of injury |

Steelers’ David DeCastro won’t play in Pro Bowl because of injury

Joe Rutter
Steelers offensive lineman David DeCastro and Maurkice Pouncey play against the Patriots Sunday, Dec. 16, 2018 at Heinz Field.

Guard David DeCastro became the second Pittsburgh Steelers player to withdraw from the Pro Bowl because of an undisclosed injury when he was replaced in the all-star game Thursday by Cleveland Browns guard Joel Bitonio.

Wide receiver Antonio Brown pulled out of the Pro Bowl last week with an injury.

DeCastro missed two games early in the season because of a fractured hand, but started the final 13 games. He was not listed on the injury report heading into the season finale against Cincinnati.

DeCastro was selected to play in his fourth consecutive Pro Bowl, but he was passed over for All-Pro consideration. He had finished first-team or second-team All-Pro in each of the previous three seasons.

DeCastro logged 958 snaps on the season and didn’t allow a sack.

With DeCastro out, the Steelers’ representatives for the Jan. 27 game in Orlando will include running back James Conner, left tackle Alejandro Villanueva, center Maurkice Pouncey, defensive tackle Cameron Heyward and wide receiver JuJu Smith-Schuster, who is an injury replacement for Brown.

Joe Rutter is a Tribune-Review staff writer. You can contact Joe at [email protected] or via Twitter @tribjoerutter.

Joe Rutter is a Tribune-Review staff writer. You can contact Joe by email at [email protected] or via Twitter .

Categories: Sports | Steelers
TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.