Decreased workload presents challenge for Penguins goalie Casey DeSmith |

Decreased workload presents challenge for Penguins goalie Casey DeSmith

Jonathan Bombulie
Pittsburgh Penguins goaltender Casey DeSmith, left, makes a save on Anaheim Ducks’ Andrew Cogliano (7) during the first period of an NHL hockey game, Monday, Dec. 17, 2018, in Pittsburgh.

Pittsburgh Penguins goalie Casey DeSmith has already cleared one significant hurdle this season.

He overcame his lack of height and prospect pedigree to establish himself as a legitimate NHL goaltender, all but officially beating out second-round draft pick Tristan Jarry for the long-term backup role behind Matt Murray when he agreed to a three-year contract extension last week.

Now, it’s on to the next.

DeSmith proved himself while carrying a heavy workload as Murray went through early-season struggles and eventually spent about a month on the sidelines with a lower-body injury.

From Nov. 7 through Dec. 15, DeSmith started 14 of the team’s 18 games. He helped keep the season from cratering, going 8-5-2 with a .920 save percentage.

Now that Murray seems to have returned to form, DeSmith’s assignments will be less frequent. Since Jan. 1, for instance, he has started only two of the team’s seven games. He has lost them both, turning in an .852 save percentage.

The next hurdle is showing he can be effective when his starts are rare.

“It’s a good lesson for me as a backup goalie,” DeSmith said. “You’ve got to let it go. You should let the last game go regardless, whether you win or lose. I think it’s a helpful thing, almost, to have to move past it and go out there and have a good practice today, a good practice tomorrow. If something happens, I play next game. Maybe I don’t play for three weeks. You just never know, but I have to look at it like the last game I played, whether we won 7-1 or lost 7-1, it’s just another game.”

For a number of reasons, DeSmith probably won’t be looking at many three-week absences in the near future.

There are enough sets of back-to-back games sprinkled throughout the schedule — the Penguins are in the midst of one this weekend in Arizona and Vegas — to make sure DeSmith won’t sit idle too long.

Also, coach Mike Sullivan said on a number of occasions that DeSmith’s body of work in the first half of the season is strong enough that it warrants playing time moving forward.

The fact that Murray has been injury prone gives Sullivan one more reason to make sure DeSmith sees at least a moderate workload.

The 27-year-old goalie is glad for all of that.

“Thankfully, it’s been a week, maybe a week and half, in between games,” DeSmith said. “That’s not something where you’re going to get in a game and feel really uncomfortable.”

While DeSmith knows he has to learn how to maintain his effectiveness while playing infrequently, he views it as just one part of his big-picture maturation as a goaltender.

Despite ranking sixth in the league among qualifying goaltenders with a .921 save percentage this season, DeSmith thinks he still has some growing to do.

“I think I made a lot of saves this year that maybe I wouldn’t have made last year based on making good reads,” DeSmith said. “That’s definitely what’s gotten better for me. That comes along with getting used to the style of play.

“I was talking to a buddy the other day who is a goalie coming out of college into pro hockey. I was like, ‘It’s going to take a second. It’s just a different style of hockey. It’s not college hockey anymore.’ It’s the same thing going from East Coast to the AHL or AHL to the NHL. It takes some getting used to.”

Jonathan Bombulie is a Tribune-Review staff writer. You can contact Jonathan at [email protected] or
via Twitter @BombulieTrib.

Jonathan Bombulie is a Tribune-Review assistant sports editor. You can contact Jonathan by email at [email protected] or via Twitter .

Categories: Sports | Penguins
TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.