Despite Penguins’ exit, Pittsburgh market remains in top 10 in playoff TV ratings |

Despite Penguins’ exit, Pittsburgh market remains in top 10 in playoff TV ratings

Jonathan Bombulie
Nate Smallwood | Tribune-Review
Pens fans get ready to watch the big screen outside of PPG Paints Arena during the Penguins game on Monday, May 29, 2017.

Despite a quick exit for the home team, Pittsburgh remains one of the top markets in the country when it comes to TV ratings for the Stanley Cup playoffs.

Through two rounds, Pittsburgh ranks as the seventh-best market with a 1.65 rating.

It’s a big drop from last season, when Pittsburgh ranked first in the country with a 4.21 rating through three rounds, though those numbers were posted under very different circumstances.

Last year, the Penguins advanced to the second round before being eliminated by Washington and much of the fanbase was captivated by the run to the final series by Marc-Andre Fleury of the Vegas Golden Knights. This year, the Penguins were swept out of the first round by the New York Islanders.

Buffalo leads the country with a 2.74 rating even though the Sabres didn’t make the playoffs. Boston, St. Louis, Providence, Columbus and Denver round out the top six. Minneapolis, Raleigh and Las Vegas were behind Pittsburgh in the top 10.

Follow the Pittsburgh Penguins all offseason long.

Jonathan Bombulie is a Tribune-Review assistant sports editor. You can contact Jonathan by email at [email protected] or via Twitter .

Categories: Sports | Penguins
TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.