Devlin Hodges, James Washington form bond for Steelers |

Devlin Hodges, James Washington form bond for Steelers

Chris Adamski
Steelers receiver James Washington pulls in a third-quarter catch past the Browns’ Denzel Ward and Sheldrick Redwine Sunday, Dec. 01, 2019 at Heinz Field.

Tuesday, James Washington and Devlin Hodges went on a duck-hunting outing.

Five days later, the duo went hunting for big plays.

Hodges and Washington connected on three passes of least 30 yards for the Pittsburgh Steelers during a 20-13 victory against the Cleveland Browns.

“I told James after the game that we are going duck hunting (this) Tuesday just like last Tuesday,” Hodges said with a smirk. “I mean, it’s awesome to have that relationship off the field. It makes on the field a little more comfortable.”

Washington posted a career-high for receiving yards (111, on four catches) in his 25th game. That it was just the second of those 25 started by Hodges might not be a coincidence.

On the third snap Hodges took after relieving Mason Rudolph early in the second half of last week’s win at the Cincinnati Bengals, Washington had a 79-yard touchdown. In the past six quarters with Hodges as his quarterback, Washington has six catches for 203 yards and two touchdowns. Before then, Washington had 24 catches for 375 yards and one touchdown.

“Honestly, I guess it’s just me and him kind knowing each other off the field … doing a lot of hunting together,” Washington said. “So we kind of get to know each other better. But it’s all about making plays that come your way at the end of the day.”

Washington’s first opportunity for a play Sunday came with the Steelers offense struggling early and the team trailing 10-0 midway through the second quarter. Washington noticed the Browns’ Sheldon Richardson jumping offsides, and Hodges saw the flag thrown for it. So Hodges heaved the ball downfield, and Washington came down with a 32-yard catch.

“Heck of a play by James,” Hodges said. “It was a little spark to get us going.”

Washington added a 30-yard touchdown catch that tied the score with 66 seconds left in the first half, and his 44-yard catch 2 minutes into the third quarter set up a Benny Snell touchdown that gave the Steelers the lead for good.

On all three of Washington’s big plays, Hodges showed trust in throwing it to him down the field while a defender had what appeared to be good coverage.

Washington’s chemistry with Hodges is even more interesting because it is Rudolph with whom Washington has a history of more than six years. Washington and Rudolph starred at Oklahoma State and were drafted 16 picks apart in 2018. Hodges is an undrafted rookie from Samford.

Then again, it’s not just Washington who has taken note of the intangible qualities Hodges has shown.

“Duck has been a leader since he stepped foot on the Steelers facility, (organized team activities),” Snell said.

Fellow running back Jaylen Samuels agreed — almost verbatim.

“It’s been like since I met him,” Samuels said of Hodges, “so throughout training camp, OTAs, he’s definitely showed everybody why he deserves to be playing. He’s out there making plays.”

Hodges completed four of his six passes that were targeted at least 20 yards downfield Sunday (one was intercepted), according to the NFL’s Next Gen Stats. Other than Washington’s plays, Tevin Jones had a 28-yard reception.

Hey, Steelers Nation, get the latest news about the Pittsburgh Steelers here.

Chris Adamski is a Tribune-Review staff writer. You can contact Chris by email at [email protected] or via Twitter .

Categories: Sports | Steelers
TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.