ShareThis Page
Down 3-0, Penguins try to take their minds off hockey |

Down 3-0, Penguins try to take their minds off hockey

Chris Adamski

Mike Sullivan’s viewing of choice was Game of Thrones. For Justin Schultz, Masters post-tournament coverage.

The routine-oriented Matt Murray and Sidney Crosby planned on spending time with family.

The Pittsburgh Penguins’ season is on the line Tuesday. But Monday, players and coaches mostly were electing to keep from dwelling too much on the three-games-to-none hole they face in their first-round series with the New York Islanders.

“It’s a great time of year. There’s lots of games on. I’ll watch some games, spend some time with family and treat it as a typical routine as far as getting ready,” Crosby said early Monday afternoon after a scheduled practice was canceled.

A we-have-nothing-to-lose mindset is permeating the Penguins (at least publicly). As defenseman Brian Dumoulin noted, at this point the pressure will shift to the Islanders if the Penguins happen to win Game 4 on Tuesday night at PPG Paints Arena.

As such, Sullivan noted that he put in his regular preparation in regards to film work and gameplanning Sunday after Game 3 and early Monday.

As for the evening?

“Maybe I’ll catch a rerun of Game of Thrones and maybe go for a walk with my dogs,” Sullivan said.

Schultz said he wanted “to try to get away from (hockey)” – and he has one other objective.

“Stay off social media,” he said.

“Just refreshing the mind. It’s a new day (Tuesday) – come ready to play.”

Keep up with the Pittsburgh Penguins all season long.

Chris Adamski is a Tribune-Review staff writer. You can contact Chris by email at [email protected] or via Twitter .

Pittsburgh Penguins center Sidney Crosby plays against the Nashville Predators in the first period of an NHL hockey game Thursday, March 21, 2019, in Nashville, Tenn.
Categories: Sports | Penguins
TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.