Duquesne’s 6-11 center Dylan Swingle plans to transfer | TribLIVE.com

Duquesne’s 6-11 center Dylan Swingle plans to transfer

Jerry DiPaola

Duquesne’s roster lost another player Wednesday — the fourth in three days — when 6-foot-11 freshman center Dylan Swingle entered the NCAA transfer portal.

Swingle did not play last season, accepting a redshirt in his first year on campus, but he’s the second 6-11 player to make plans to transfer this week, joining Gavin Bizeau.

Swingle was one of the top players in Ohio during the 2017-18 season, setting school records for career points (1,796) and rebounds (1,160) at Paint Valley High School. He was ranked 35th nationally among centers by 247 Sports.

After Swingle, Bizeau and guards Eric Williams Jr. and Brandon Wade entered their names in the portal, Duquesne has eight scholarship players on its roster, including forwards Amari Kelly and Austin Rotroff, who are recovering from knee surgery.

Four other players could join the active roster next season.

James Ellis, a 6-foot-11, 230-pound center from Westinghouse, is returning next season after sitting out his freshman year. Coach Keith Dambrot currently has a verbal commitment from Kennedy Catholic guard Maceo Austin, who pledged last year.

Also, point guard Evan Buckley of Stone Bridge (Va.) High School announced his commitment to Duquesne on his Twitter account and 6-4 shooting guard Ashton Miller of Seton Hall (N.J.) Prep has committed to the Dukes, according to verbalcommits.com.

Jerry DiPaola is a Tribune-Review staff writer. You can contact Jerry by email at [email protected] or via Twitter .

Categories: Sports | Duquesne
TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.