ShareThis Page
Duquesne gets signatures on letters of intent from 2 guards | TribLIVE.com
Duquesne

Duquesne gets signatures on letters of intent from 2 guards

Jerry DiPaola
1041845_web1_gtr-DUQrecruiting-xxxxxx

Guards Ashton Miller and Evan Buckley, who had previously given Duquesne coach Keith Dambrot verbal commitments to join the team, signed their letters of intent, the school announced.

Miller, who scored 991 of his 1,220 career points over his final two seasons at Seton Hall (N.J.) Prep, averaged 20.2 points, 4.6 rebounds, 3.9 assists and 2.0 steals this season. He was a third-team all-state selection after averaging 25.8 points in five Essex County and North Jersey Non-Public A tournament games.

“Ashton has a tremendous upside,” Dambrot said in a statement. “At 6-5, he has a long wingspan to go along with good ball-handling and shooting skills.

“He has the ability to play and defend multiple positions. Ashton comes from a high-level program at Seton Hall Prep, which should help in his adjustment to the college game.”

Buckley, who was named second-team all-state in the Class 5 Virginia High School League, is the Stone Bridge High School record holder for career points (1,467) and assists (156).

A 6-foot-1 point guard, he averaged 22.5 points and 8.0 assists as a senior. Over his final two seasons, he played a role in 75 percent of his team’s field goals with a basket or assist.

“Evan is an old school, pass-first point guard with good toughness and strength,” Dambrot said. “He is a relentless competitor with a culture-changing type of work ethic. His high school coach, Corey Stitzel, has coached at the Division I level, and I really think that has helped Evan develop as a player.”

Jerry DiPaola is a Tribune-Review staff writer. You can contact Jerry by email at [email protected] or via Twitter .

Categories: Sports | Duquesne
TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.