Duquesne guard Eric Williams Jr. explores transferring | TribLIVE.com

Duquesne guard Eric Williams Jr. explores transferring

Jerry DiPaola
Nate Smallwood | Tribune-Review
Duquesne’s Eric Williams Jr. drives to the basket during Duquesne’s loss to Penn State at PPG Paints Arena on Dec. 19, 2018.

Duquesne sophomore Eric Williams Jr., the last scholarship player on the roster not recruited by coach Keith Dambrot, has put his name into the NCAA transfer portal and announced his intentions to leave the program. Williams made the announcement on Twitter.

The loss of Williams, a 6-foot-6, 205-pound guard, is not an insignificant one. He led the team in scoring (14.0 points) and rebounding (7.6) during 2018-19 and scored 84 points while shooting 65.3 percent from the field in the final three games. He scored 40 in an 85-75 loss at Saint Louis.

Williams also led the team in rebounding during the 2017-18 season (8.8) and was second in scoring (14.3) to guard Mike Lewis II. Lewis transferred to Nevada earlier this year.

He also was second on the team in average minutes played (30.8), even after Dambrot decided not to start him in four nonconference games in December.

Duquesne also will lose freshman guard Brandon Wade and 6-foot-11 freshman forward Gavin Bizeau, who have joined Williams in the transfer portal. Wade, 6-foot-2, made one start last season, but averaged only 9.3 minutes and one point per game. Bizeau played in 20 games, averaging 5.5 minutes and recording a total of 26 points and 14 rebounds.

Meanwhile, Dambrot has been recruiting to fill the holes on his roster. Point guard Evan Buckley of Stone Bridge (Va.) High School announced on Twitter his plans to join the Dukes’ 2019 recruiting class. He joins Kennedy Catholic guard Maceo Austin.

Jerry DiPaola is a Tribune-Review staff writer. You can contact Jerry by email at [email protected] or via Twitter .

Categories: Sports | Duquesne
TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.