ShareThis Page
Duquesne making history in Dambrot’s 2nd season | TribLIVE.com
Duquesne

Duquesne making history in Dambrot’s 2nd season

Chris Adamski
827738_web1_gtr-dambrot-111018

In all likelihood, Saturday was 426th of 427 men’s basketball games Duquesne will play over 31 seasons at what has been called the A.J. Palumbo Center.

With a comprehensive, two-year renovation rendering it almost unrecognizable set to begin next month, the Dukes are sending the facility out in style.

Duquesne set a record for wins over a season at Palumbo with their 80-73 victory against Massachusetts. The Dukes, who host Dayton the regular-season finale next Saturday, are 14-4 at Palumbo in 2018-19.

“That’s pretty cool because it’s the last time this building is going to be like this this year,” forward Michael Hughes said. “So it’s nice to go out like that.”

Duquesne last posted 14 home wins during the 1980-81 season.

After initially crediting the scheduling of athletic director Dave Harper for the Palumbo wins record, second-year coach Keith Dambrot noted how he wants the wins to translate into better crowds at what will be known as the UPMC Cooper Fieldhouse beginning in 2020-21.

“You have to win at home in order to have a good program,” Dambrot said, “so the next step when we get back in here over a year from now is we have to fill up to make a very difficult place to play.”

The Palumbo record isn’t the only wins mark that Duquesne is set to eclipse this season. At 10-6 in the Atlantic 10, the Dukes have tied their program record for conference victories in a season. And they have two games left to break it, beginning Wednesday at Saint Louis.

Duquesne went 10-3 in the Eastern Eight in 1980-81, it went 10-8 in the A-10 in 1990-91 and 10-6 in the conference in 2010-11.

Asked what the conference wins record means, Dambrot talked big picture about his quest to return Duquesne to relevance. Dambrot’s father, Sid, played on Dukes teams that reached a No. 1 national ranking in the early 1950’s.

“When I came here, I came here because I think Duquesne fans have suffered for a long time,” he said. “And my dad wasn’t too pleased about it either. And I felt like with the commitment from the school and the commitment from the athletic director, the president, the board of trustees and the academic reputation of the school and the city’s revitalization, being a great job market, great city, I felt like if I could coach at all I would have a chance to turn this thing around. I felt like the risk-reward was really good.

“And I didn’t know how quick it would take. I tried to do it the right way. So I think we have turned it around. I think we certainly are competitive; I don’t think we are where I want to be yet but we are competitive and that’s a little bit more than they have been over the last 40 years over the most part. And it really wasn’t the coaches’ fault at that time. There’s a lot of factors that go into winning and losing, so my situation is I told people when I took the job if I didn’t win it was going to be all on me. It wasn’t going to be because the school wasn’t committed, it wasn’t because Duquesne didn’t care about basketball, it wasn’t going to be because it wasn’t a great school. It’s all on me, and making sure I get the right people, the right culture, the players. And the school’s done more than I can ask. Now the key is can we continue to develop and get better. We certainly don’t want to stay here (at this level of being 19-10). But it’s hard to stay here even. But we have got to try to get better so we can be a championship-quality team every single year. That’s really what I want. And then get to that NCAA tournament so those Duquesne people can be happy.”

Chris Adamski is a Tribune-Review staff writer. You can contact Chris by email at [email protected] or via Twitter .

Categories: Sports | Duquesne
TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.