Duquesne opens season at PPG Paints Arena with 94-67 victory against Princeton | TribLIVE.com

Duquesne opens season at PPG Paints Arena with 94-67 victory against Princeton

Jerry DiPaola

There was plenty for Duquesne coach Keith Dambrot to like about his team’s 94-67 opening-night victory against Princeton on Tuesday at PPG Paints Arena.

How about that 85-44 surge after falling behind 23-9 nine minutes into the game?

And it was hard not to like Sincere Carry’s pain-free performance on his surgically repaired knee. The sophomore point guard strung together a stat line that included a game-high 23 points (three 3s), five assists, one steal and only three turnovers in 32 minutes.

But those are just numbers, and this was only a non-conference game that will be long forgotten when Duquesne gets deep into the Atlantic 10 season this winter.

What especially pleases Dambrot is what he knew before the game, what he believes separates this year’s team — his third at Duquesne — from the 2018-2019 group that won 19 games but lost four of its last five and bowed out after the first round of the A-10 tournament.

“Camaraderie, character, caring about winning,” he said when asked to describe the difference between the teams. Carry backed up his coach’s words when asked the same question.

“Last year, we were just teammates,” he said. “Now, it’s more of a family. We have each other’s back. We trust each other. It’s going to be somebody new every night up here (talking to reporters after the game).”

The ease of the victory surprised Dambrot after Princeton hit 17 of 29 shots in the first half and led 42-37 at halftime.

Nonetheless, Dambrot said he walked into the locker room without any intention of yelling at his team.

“I went in very calm,” he said. “Then, I got mad and screamed and yelled for about three minutes mostly because I didn’t like some things I heard. Then, I calmed down again.”

What did he hear?

The coach was reluctant to betray the sanctity of the locker room, saying, “Normal stuff when things go badly.”

Then, he added, “I want guys when things go badly and they’re not playing well that they’re upbeat. I didn’t like some of it.”

Encouraged by its coach, Duquesne wore down Princeton in the second half, hitting 23 of 36 shots (63.9 percent) and playing stingy defense.

“We got hit in the mouth (in the first half),” Dambrot said, “so we had to react. It’s going to happen another 30 times this year. We might as well learn to take the body blow and see if we can react to it.”

Carry said the team played “selfish” in the first half.

“We weren’t making the extra pass and weren’t playing hard on defense,” he said. “He told us we need to do better in those areas. (After halftime), we played hard. We played free and made the game simple.”

For the game, the Dukes hit 52 percent of their 3s (13 of 25), getting a unique 3-for-4 performance from beyond the arc by 6-foot-11 graduate transfer Baylee Steele.

When Steele was at Eastern Michigan and Utah Valley State earlier in his career, he tried a total of only 11 3-pointers, making two. He hit one more than that in the first 13 minutes against Princeton and finished with 19 points.

“My last coaches didn’t like their five man shooting 3s,” Steele said. “Coach D does. Simple.”

College Videos

Jerry DiPaola is a Tribune-Review staff writer. You can contact Jerry by email at [email protected] or via Twitter .

Categories: Sports | Duquesne
TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.