Effects of concussion not to blame for slump, Penguins’ Patric Hornqvist says | TribLIVE.com

Effects of concussion not to blame for slump, Penguins’ Patric Hornqvist says

Chris Adamski

It’s a fairly clear and direct line that can be drawn. Patric Hornqvist has been one of the NHL’s most consistent goal-scorers for a decade, scoring between 21 and 30 goals for eight consecutive full seasons – and he was on pace to end up in the high end of that window once again during this recently-completed season.

Then, the Pittsburgh Penguins forward suffered a concussion when he absorbed a puck to the face Jan. 8 at Florida. That cost him four games that he couldn’t play in. But did it also cost him his goal-scoring mojo?

No, Hornqvist insisted during a season wrap-up session with media Thursday.

“I just didn’t play well,” he said, “and had that slump there for a long time and it’s hard to get out of those when you get in those. And then it feels like you’re doing the right thing and the puck doesn’t go your way and you get frustrated and that’s probably the worst thing you can do.”

Counting his scoreless four games during the sweep by the Islanders, Hornqvist had three goals (12 points) over his 39 games after the concussion. He had 15 goals in the 34 games to that point of the season.

Hornqvist twice quickly shot down any questions regarding any worries he might have in relation to suffering concussion or on its effects on his game.

Hornqvist, 32, is entering the second season of a five-year, $26.5 million contract extension he signed last year.

“I learned a lot from this season,” Hornqvist said. “We didn’t have the result that we wanted as a team and for myself too, I didn’t play as good as I can and regroup and go.”

Keep up with the Pittsburgh Penguins all season long.

Chris Adamski is a Tribune-Review staff writer. You can contact Chris by email at [email protected] or via Twitter .

Categories: Sports | Penguins
TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.