ESPN power-ranking formula tabs Steelers as exactly average among NFL’s 32 teams |

ESPN power-ranking formula tabs Steelers as exactly average among NFL’s 32 teams

Chris Adamski
Chiefs tight end Travis Kelce celebrates a first down during the third quarter against the Steelers Sunday, Sept. 16, 2018, at Heinz Field.

The Worldwide Leader is predicting that the Pittsburgh Steelers will be very average this season.

ESPN’s first Football Power Index of 2019 is out, and the network used it to rank the NFL teams 1-32. The Steelers came out right in the middle at No. 16.

The ESPN calculation projects the Steelers at 8.5 wins and with a 45.8% chance of making the postseason.

ESPN explains its FPI as: “Each team’s rating is composed of a predicted offensive, defensive and special teams efficiency, as measured by expected points added per play, and that rating is the basis for FPI’s game-level and season-level projections.”

The good news for the Steelers? If ESPN is accurate, they’ll still be well in the thick of the AFC North race. The Cleveland Browns, Steelers and Baltimore Ravens, respectively, are Nos. 15-17 in the power rankings (the Cincinnati Bengals are 29th).

The Browns are projected for 8.8 wins and a 51.5% postseason chance; the Ravens, like the Steelers, are pegged at 8.5 wins – but Baltimore has a slightly smaller chance than the Steelers at making the playoffs (44.9%).

ESPN’s FPI ranks the Kansas City Chiefs as the NFL’s best team, followed by the New Orleans Saints, Los Angeles Rams and New England Patriots.

The worst team? The Miami Dolphins, followed by the Arizona Cardinals and New York Giants.

Hey, Steeler Nation, get the latest news about the Pittsburgh Steelers here.

Chris Adamski is a Tribune-Review staff writer. You can contact Chris by email at [email protected] or via Twitter .

Categories: Sports | Steelers
TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.