ShareThis Page
ESPN’s Mel Kiper predicts Steelers will draft inside linebacker in 1st round |
Breakfast With Benz

ESPN’s Mel Kiper predicts Steelers will draft inside linebacker in 1st round

Tim Benz
| Friday, January 18, 2019 8:56 a.m

The worst thing about the NFL season ending way too early is that NFL Draft season starts way too early.

But Steelers fans will likely enjoy this speculation to kick off the campaign. ESPN’s Mel Kiper has the Steelers drafting an inside linebacker in the first round.

That’s a position of need, and the Steelers didn’t adequately address it last year when they couldn’t move up in the draft to get one. They just had to settle for signing Jon Bostic in free agency.

But in case you are curious, the ILB Kiper tabbed for the Steelers is Michigan’s Devin Bush.

“The weakness on defense was at inside linebacker, as they struggled to replace Ryan Shazier,” Kiper says. “The phrase I keep repeating about Bush is ‘perfect for today’s NFL.’ He would be a great fit as a three-down linebacker who never has to leave the field. At 5-foot-11, Bush is undersized, but he should test well at the combine.”

Devin White of LSU is largely considered the best at the position in the draft. Bush is rated third by Of course, any of the names on this list could jump around going into the combine and individual workouts.

The fit seems to make sense, if you aren’t concerned about Bush’s size. Which the Steelers may be. Even if they are, the need to replace Ryan Shazier is massive.

Keep in mind, inside linebackers Leighton Vander Esch and Rashaan Evans were drafted 19th and 22nd last year. The Steelers tried to trade up to get at least one of them during the first round.

They draft 20th this year.

Tim Benz is a Tribune-Review staff writer. You can contact Tim at or via Twitter. All tweets could be reposted. All emails are subject to publication unless specified otherwise.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.