Ex-Steelers WR Antonio Brown a no-show at opening of Raiders OTAs | TribLIVE.com

Ex-Steelers WR Antonio Brown a no-show at opening of Raiders OTAs

Chris Adamski
Steelers receiver Antonio Brown celebrates his second quarter touchdown catch against the Patriots Sunday, Dec. 16, 2018, at Heinz Field.

Many of Antonio Brown’s former Pittsburgh Steelers teammates were asked about Brown on Tuesday during the Steelers’ first organized team activity session of 2019.

Anyone expecting Brown to speak to media about his former team, though, didn’t get that chance because according to multiple reports Brown was not present Tuesday at the first Oakland Raiders OTA.

It should be noted that appearance at these sessions is voluntary, per the NFL’s collective bargaining agreement with its players. But attendance is typically higher than 90 percent. For example, there were only two notable absences from the Steelers OTA on Tuesday.

According to the Las Vegas Review-Journal, Raiders coach Jon Gruden did not provide an explanation for Brown’s absence.

“I wouldn’t reach much into this,” Gruden said, according to the Review-Journal. “I’m sure people will.”

Brown missed OTA sessions for the Steelers last year, but he was at the first one in May 2018.

Brown joins another former Steelers All Pro who left the team over the offseason – running back Le’Veon Bell – who were no-shows at the first OTA for their respective new teams.

Hey, Steelers Nation, get the latest news about the Pittsburgh Steelers here.

Chris Adamski is a Tribune-Review staff writer. You can contact Chris by email at [email protected] or via Twitter .

Categories: Sports | Steelers
TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.