ShareThis Page
Fantasy sports podcast: Andrew McCutchen’s injury, Pirates trade rumors | TribLIVE.com
Breakfast With Benz

Fantasy sports podcast: Andrew McCutchen’s injury, Pirates trade rumors

Tim Benz
1258329_web1_AP19155101214830
AP Photo
Philadelphia Phillies’ Andrew McCutchen, center, is helped by a trainer after being injured while trying to get back to first base during the first inning of a baseball game against the San Diego Padres Monday, June 3, 2019, in San Diego. Phillies manager Gabe Kapler, right, looks on. (AP Photo/Gregory Bull)

It’s our weekly fantasy sports podcast with Jeff Erickson of Rotowire.

One of our big topics of conversation is Andrew McCutchen’s injury. How will the Phillies adjust? And how should fantasy owners of McCutchen adjust?

There’s been some talk of the Phillies perhaps being interested in Starling Marte. We kick around how seriously we should take those trade rumors.

Similarly, we may have found some reasons why the Yankees may be shopping Clint Frazier to the Pirates once more.


LISTEN: Andrew McCutchen’s injury, Pirates trade rumors

We dive into the impact of Craig Kimbrel going to the Cubs and where Dallas Keuchel may wind up. From a fantasy perspective, Jeff gives some advice about how aggressive fantasy owners should be in their pursuit of them.

Miguel Cabrera has been a rollercoaster in fantasy leagues. We track what’s happening there, particularly when it comes to him being a full-time designated hitter.

Plus, Erickson and I discuss barrel rate, the MLB draft, and even fantasy cricket.

Yes, fantasy cricket!

Tim Benz is a Tribune-Review staff writer. You can contact Tim at [email protected] or via Twitter. All tweets could be reposted. All emails are subject to publication unless specified otherwise.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.