Fantasy sports podcast: Concerns about Steelers players, loading up versus Dolphins | TribLIVE.com
Breakfast With Benz

Fantasy sports podcast: Concerns about Steelers players, loading up versus Dolphins

Tim Benz
1665716_web1_AP_19252583702196
AP
Pittsburgh Steelers wide receiver JuJu Smith-Schuster runs a pass route Sunday as New England Patriots defensive back J.C. Jackson (left) gives chase in the second half of the game in Foxborough, Mass.

It’s our weekly fantasy sports podcast with Jeff Erickson of Rotowire.

Some people are worried about Steelers receiver JuJu Smith-Schuster in fantasy play after Week 1. Jeff tells us why you shouldn’t buy into that concern.

How many Patriots should you play against Miami? And how heavy should you invest in the “anti-Miami” strategy? Those are in-depth topics of conversation this week.

There’s some delicate New England strategy to keep in mind as well. Jeff tells us how to avoid “rules” and “maxisms” when making fantasy plays.

Listen for some Thursday night advice before Tampa Bay versus Carolina. And it has to do with running backs. Plus, we investigate if Mike Evans will have a bounce-back evening.

We get into why Lamar Jackson and Antonio Brown are good plays this week, and moving forward. In fact, Jeff has some trade advice for you concerning A.B.

Believe it or not, there may be some encouraging signs for folks who have Bengals on their roster. We investigate that notion.

Jeff and I agree on one team to select in your knockout pool besides the Patriots.

Lastly, we bemoan the Christian Yelich injury on the baseball front.


LISTEN: Tim Benz, Jeff Erickson talk Steelers players, Patriots players, and the ‘anti-Miami’ strategy

Tim Benz is a Tribune-Review staff writer. You can contact Tim at [email protected] or via Twitter. All tweets could be reposted. All emails are subject to publication unless specified otherwise.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.