Fantasy Sports podcast: Football draft advice, MLB trade fallout, Reds-Pirates brawl |
Breakfast With Benz

Fantasy Sports podcast: Football draft advice, MLB trade fallout, Reds-Pirates brawl

Tim Benz
On the topic of unhappy, high-value running backs, this week’s Fantasy Sports podcast offers a forecast of how owners will view the squawking coming Melvin Gordon (left) and Ezekiel Elliott in the wake of Le’Veon Bell’s actions last year.

Fantasy football drafts are happening soon. Are you ready? Need some advice?

Jeff Erickson of RotoWire gets you prepared in our weekly fantasy sports podcast.

We look at where Steelers players Ben Roethlisberger, Vance McDonald and JuJu Smith-Schuster rank among star players at their respective positions.

Also, Jeff tells us where he places Antonio Brown and Le’Veon Bell as opposed to where he would have if they had remained in Pittsburgh.

We also dive into the topic of unhappy, high-value running backs. Jeff gives us a forecast of how fantasy owners will view the squawking coming from Melvin Gordon and Ezekiel Elliott in the wake of Bell’s actions last year.

Then there is Major League Baseball. After a lot of activity at the trade deadline, Jeff gives his opinions on which players will do the most damage in their new location.

And, since Jeff is a Cincinnati fan, we fight about the fight involving his Reds and the Pirates.

LISTEN: Fantasy sports podcast with football draft advice

Tim Benz is a Tribune-Review staff writer. You can contact Tim at [email protected] or via Twitter. All tweets could be reposted. All emails are subject to publication unless specified otherwise.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.