First Call: A tremendous Sidney Crosby story; NFL teams play on 80-yard field |
Breakfast With Benz

First Call: A tremendous Sidney Crosby story; NFL teams play on 80-yard field

Tim Benz
In this June 12, 2016, file photo, Pittsburgh Penguins center Sidney Crosby raises the Stanley Cup after the Penguins defeated the San Jose Sharks in Game 6.

Friday’s “First Call” features a “Sid-sational” story about the Penguins captain. “Hard Knocks” will have a field day with that Canadian preseason game field fiasco. And Gritty the mascot has become weaponized.

Just who he is

Here is a clip about Sidney Crosby that has been making the rounds on social media. TSN play-by-play man Gord Miller was on TSN Radio’s “OverDrive 1050” Wednesday.

And he told this tale about how Sidney Crosby toured the Stanley Cup around Cole Harbour in 2016.

Wait, so it’s possible to just accomplish a spontaneous act of kindness out of the goodness of your heart without a camera crew and press release?

Who knew?

This makes me nervous

Flyers mascot Gritty was a danger to society since Day 1.

Now it’s gotten worse. No Flyer — mascot or otherwise — should be given weapons like this.

Plus, we’ve all seen how irresponsible Gritty has been in the past when it comes to firearms.

The ax-throwing seems like a big risk to me.

What’s up in Winnipeg?

This will go over big on “Hard Knocks.”

Thursday’s Raiders game against the Packers in Winnipeg had to be played on an 80-yard field because Green Bay didn’t like the turf in the end zone.

In part, the Packers had concerns over the holes where the goal posts normally sit on the CFL field.

So the teams played on an 80-yard field.

Did anyone complain about their helmet, too?

Jon Gruden wasn’t wild about the decision to shorten the playing surface.

“The field, I don’t know what that was all about,” Gruden said via NBC Sports Bay Area. “We thought the field was perfectly fine.”

A lot of the starters — including Antonio Brown — didn’t play. The Raiders won 22-21.

Fantasy frenzy

Fantasy football owners are awash with angst over what to do about drafting Ezekiel Elliott.

Is he going to hold out from the Dallas Cowboys?

Hmm. I bet the real Cowboys are kind of nervous, too, huh?

Now word comes from ESPN’s Ed Werder in Dallas that the organization is ready to make Elliott the second-highest paid running back in football.

So it appears Le’Veon Bell reset the market for running backs after all.

He brought it down.

If this report from Werder is right, now other teams aren’t allowing themselves to overpay at the level that the Los Angeles Rams did for Todd Gurley. But they are willing to allow themselves to overpay at the level that the New York Jets did for Bell.

I bet Melvin Gordon falls into that range with the Los Angeles Chargers, too.

Irony can be a beautiful thing, can’t it?

Take that, Baker!

Clearly inspired by the vicious hate spewed by Browns quarterback Baker Mayfield in “GQ,” Giants quarterback Daniel Jones played well in a preseason game.


The rookie quarterback went 9 of 11 for 141 yards in a 25-23 win over the Bengals. That’s on the heels of a 11-of-14 performance for 161 yards and a touchdown against Chicago and a 5-of-5 outing with a score against the Jets in the preseason opener.

Despite his strong start, it appears the Giants are moving forward with a plan to have Eli Manning remain the starter.

New York wraps up the preseason against the Patriots next Thursday.

Tim Benz is a Tribune-Review staff writer. You can contact Tim at [email protected] or via Twitter. All tweets could be reposted. All emails are subject to publication unless specified otherwise.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.