First call: Blue Jackets jump Penguins; Carolina fans mad about Antonio Brown |
Breakfast With Benz

First call: Blue Jackets jump Penguins; Carolina fans mad about Antonio Brown

Tim Benz
Columbus Blue Jackets forward Josh Anderson controls the puck against Philadelphia Flyers defenseman Travis Sanheim on Feb. 28, 2019, in Columbus, Ohio.

In “First Call” Friday, the Penguins are back outside of the playoff bracket again. Pitt has a huge road challenge. A little perspective on the Bryce Harper signing. Carolina fans are mad at me.

Back outside

Columbus’ 4-3 win over the Flyers caused some shuffling in the Eastern Conference standings. That vaults them back into a playoff slot as the third-place team in the Metropolitan Division with 75 points.

The Penguins have 74 points, tied with Carolina for the second wild-card position. As of now, the Hurricanes hold that playoff spot by virtue of having one more win than the Penguins.

Meanwhile, the Islanders won 6-1 over Toronto to get back into first place in the Metro with 81.

Well, when you put it that way!

The Phillies have landed Bryce Harper for a record 13 years and $330 million.

Reaction is coming from all over the place. Many in Philadelphia seem happy to have won the sweepstakes, getting a former MVP such as Harper.

Others think the Phillies spent too much. Those in that camp have this tweet from Darren Rovell of The Action Network to back their argument.

Wow. Thirteen more years at that price. Harper will have plenty of money as he waits to watch the Flyers win the Stanley Cup.

Wrong Panthers

It’s not rare for me to make Panthers fans mad.

Usually it’s Pitt Panthers fans, though. Not Carolina Panthers fans.

I’ve gotten a few emails from Carolina in response to my story suggesting Charlotte may be a good fit for Antonio Brown because I said Newton could use the help with a “dearth” of receiving options and a “shaky” offensive line.

That second complaint is valid. That was too broad of a brush by me. I wasn’t referring to run blocking, where the Panthers had the fourth-best rush offense. And when it comes to sacks allowed (26) and hits allowed (78), the Panthers actually did well.

But down the stretch, Newton was sacked five times by the Steelers, four times each by Tampa and New Orleans and three times by Detroit before he sat out the last two games.

As far as his wide receivers go, Devin Funchess is a free agent. DJ Moore and Curtis Samuel are up-and-coming. But Moore’s 157-yard receiving game in Detroit in November was the only receiving effort over 100 yards cashed in by a Panthers wide receiver all year.

Brown had 104 catches, 10 more than those two combined. He had 15 more yards than those two combined and 15 touchdowns to their seven combined.

The Panthers could use Antonio Brown.

Plus, it’s a day late for “U mad, bro?” anyway.

College calendar

When it comes to college basketball, Pitt looks to break its 11-game losing streak at No. 2-ranked Virginia at 2 p.m. Saturday.

UMass comes to Palumbo Center to play Duquesne at 2 p.m. Saturday, as well. The Dukes are coming off a conference-schedule-worst 21-point loss to St. Bonaventure on Wednesday. But they are 9-6 in conference play. The Minutemen come in at 3-12.

The Robert Morris men’s basketball team lost to Sacred Heart, 87-63, on Thursday night. The Colonials (10-7 NEC) have their regular season finale at Wagner (8-9) at 4 p.m. Saturday. RMU and Sacred Heart are now tied for third in the conference

As for the Robert Morris hockey team, Derrick Schooley’s club has senior night Saturday. Those Colonials conclude their regular season with a home-and-home against Mercyhurst. The teams play in Erie tonight, and the return game is at the Island Sports Center at 7:05 p.m. Saturday.

Tim Benz is a Tribune-Review staff writer. You can contact Tim at [email protected] or via Twitter. All tweets could be reposted. All emails are subject to publication unless specified otherwise.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.