First Call: Chef reportedly sues Antonio Brown for nearly $40K in unpaid bills |
Breakfast With Benz

First Call: Chef reportedly sues Antonio Brown for nearly $40K in unpaid bills

Tim Benz
Oakland Raiders wide receiver Antonio Brown during NFL football minicamp Tuesday, June 11, 2019, in Alameda, Calif.

I guess we now know why Antonio Brown was checking his bank account during those Oakland Raiders film sessions.

He must’ve been looking for $40,000.

And apparently, he couldn’t find it.

According to, the former Steeler is accused of stiffing a personal chef at the 2018 Pro Bowl.

Jeremy Fowler writes: “Stefano Tedeschi — who goes by the name ‘The Sports Chef’ — filed suit in Osceola (Florida) County on July 30, claiming that Brown’s balance of $38,521.20 remains unpaid.”

ESPN interviewed the “Sports Chef” on Wednesday.

As the story goes, Brown rented a house near Orlando and hired Tedeschi to cook for a few days for up to 50 Pro Bowl teammates and guests, Tedeschi told ESPN.

He alleges that Brown refused to pay him, thus forcing Tedeschi to pay his staff out of pocket. And the chef claims Brown kept Tedeschi’s equipment and food at the house.

Tedeschi also tells Fowler that Brown — who demanded Tedeschi never make eye contact with him — later offered to pay Tedeschi, but only via social media advertising.

Tedeschi said he didn’t accept.

Brown’s attorney told ESPN that they “expect to be filing a motion to dismiss the complaint.”

Maybe this is the reason behind some of these tweets from Brown.

Then again, we are talking about Brown. These tweets could have nothing to do with this incident and could be about something else.

Stay tuned.

Meanwhile, the Raiders are making it look like it’s all sunshine and daisies in “Silver and Black.”

“Hard Knocks,” the ball is in your court.

Tim Benz is a Tribune-Review staff writer. You can contact Tim at [email protected] or via Twitter. All tweets could be reposted. All emails are subject to publication unless specified otherwise.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.