First Call: Deion Sanders says Ben Roethlisberger will retire during season; Raiders fans roast Antonio Brown |
Breakfast With Benz

First Call: Deion Sanders says Ben Roethlisberger will retire during season; Raiders fans roast Antonio Brown

Tim Benz
Pittsburgh Steelers quarterback Ben Roethlisberger speaks to the media following an NFL football game against the New England Patriots, Monday, Sept. 9, 2019, in Foxborough, Mass.

In Tuesday’s “First Call,” Raiders fans voice their displeasure about Antonio Brown. Details of Brown’s contract with the Patriots are out. Deion Sanders seems to think Ben Roethlisberger will retire. And the Astros are unstoppable.

What are they saying?

The Oakland Raiders were on Monday Night Football at home to start the 2019 season against the Denver Broncos.

The hope was to see the “Black Hole” go crazy over Antonio Brown’s debut. But, of course, he lost his mind and forced his way out of town.

Oakland won anyway, though. The Raiders topped the Broncos 24-16. After one of their touchdowns, the crowd started chanting something.

I can’t quite make out what the refrain is here. It sounds like it’s maybe directed at Antonio Br… See the clip here.

Banking on himself

Brown’s contract with New England became official Monday.

Part of it is that Brown gets a $20 million guaranteed option if the Patriots want to pick it up.

According to NFL Network Insider Ian Rapoport, the full terms of Brown’s contract look like this: “$1 million fully guaranteed in base salary, a $9 million signing bonus ($5 million now, $4 million later), $500,000 in 46-man roster bonuses and performance incentives of $1.5 million for each of these — 105 catches, 1,298 yards, 16 TDs, or just more than Brown’s 2018 production (104/1,297/15).”

No Patriots receiver has had such a stat line. And I doubt a Patriots receiver will get a $20 million salary. That’ll have to be reworked into a different deal against the cap, unless the Patriots decided to go the Darrelle Revis route again.

Patriots fans seem to be on board with the move.


That’s a bit much

A lot of crummy things were said about the Steelers in the wake of their 33-3 loss to the Patriots.

Most of them deserved. Many of them, by me.

But this one was a bit insane. Deion Sanders on “NFL Gameday” says that Ben Roethlisberger is going to retire before the end of the season. Sanders called the Steelers quarterback “disengaged” and “disinterested” Sunday in New England.

That must be news to Big Ben since he signed a three-year extension before the start of the year. And he is on record as saying that he has found his joy for football again this offseason.

Look, Deion, Roethlisberger was bad Sunday. But he’s not emotionally shutting down.

What time is it?

Odell Beckham Jr. knows what time it is.

Why? Because the Cleveland Browns receiver was wearing a $250,000 watch during his team’s 43-13 loss against the Tennessee Titans Sunday.

It’s time to start playing better, I guess.

And the NFL is looking into it. League spokesperson Michael Signora tells there are no rules prohibiting jewelry. However, the league does have a policy “prohibiting hard objects.”

Coach Freddie Kitchens claims he didn’t know that Beckham was wearing a watch.

Ease up!

The Houston Astros aren’t just winning. They are hurting the pride of other teams.

Houston just completed a four-game sweep of the Seattle Mariners at the end of last week. During that series, they scored 41 runs, including 21 on Sunday.

Meanwhile, 12 NFL teams had fewer than 21 points Sunday.

The Astros weren’t done after Seattle. They stayed on the accelerator versus the Oakland A’s Monday, hitting six home runs.

Houston won 15-0. They have a 95-50 record and lead the A’s by 10.5 games in the American League West. The East-leading Yankees are also 95-50, tied for the best record in Major League Baseball.

Tim Benz is a Tribune-Review staff writer. You can contact Tim at [email protected] or via Twitter. All tweets could be reposted. All emails are subject to publication unless specified otherwise.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.