First Call: How Cleveland media reacted to Myles Garrett hitting Mason Rudolph with helmet | TribLIVE.com
Breakfast With Benz

First Call: How Cleveland media reacted to Myles Garrett hitting Mason Rudolph with helmet

Tim Benz
1947645_web1_AP_19319466336969
AP
Cleveland Browns defensive end Myles Garrett walks off the field after he was ejected late in the fourth quarter against the Pittsburgh Steelers, Thursday, Nov. 14, 2019, in Cleveland.

Nationally, there has been a slew of reactions to Vontaze Garrett — uh, excuse me — Myles Garrett’s helmet-swinging incident Thursday night.

Hey, Myles, if O.J. Simpson is the one having your back, you probably weren’t in the right.

But what are they saying in Cleveland?

Dan Labbe of Cleveland.com is wondering whether what Garrett did is the result of a locker room culture that has no discipline.

Former Ohio State Buckeye and Browns radio and TV analyst Dustin Fox is going after head coach Freddie Kitchens, too.

This certainly isn’t Garrett’s first offense on an NFL field.

Doug Lesmerises, also of Cleveland.com, says Garrett damaged his reputation and tamped down the enthusiasm of the Browns’ win over the Steelers.

Anthony Lima of 92.3 The Fan seems to have a similar take.

Jonathan Peterlin, also of 92.3, notes that Larry Ogunjobi should be getting some heat, too.

Meanwhile, their colleague Daryl Ruiter is shifting blame onto Rudolph for starting it.

Tony Grossi of 850 ESPN Cleveland & Fox Sports Ohio says this game was historically brutal.

The rest of the internet, it appears, would rather just make fun of Ben Roethlisberger.

This dude abides.

Tim Benz is a Tribune-Review staff writer. You can contact Tim at [email protected] or via Twitter. All tweets could be reposted. All emails are subject to publication unless specified otherwise.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.