First Call: Le’Veon Bell weighs in on Antonio Brown’s helmet; Sidney Crosby is a ‘decade-long’ MVP | TribLIVE.com
Breakfast With Benz

First Call: Le’Veon Bell weighs in on Antonio Brown’s helmet; Sidney Crosby is a ‘decade-long’ MVP

Tim Benz
1574449_web1_1559606-8cb62b1a8baf44ddbacd2f8da565888c
AP
In this July 25, 2019, file photo, New York Jets running back Le’Veon Bell participates during practice at the NFL football team’s training camp in Florham Park, N.J.

In “First Call” Thursday, Le’Veon Bell shows balance where Antonio Brown has lost his mind. More career twists for Kevin White and Derick Brassard. Sidney Crosby is a “decade-long” MVP.


Le’Veon’s logic

When you are looking for logic and sanity you turn to … Le’Veon Bell?

Yes, believe it or not, the New York Jets running back is a voice of sanity when it comes to the helmet debate generated by his former Steelers teammate Antonio Brown.

“I understand where he’s coming from, but at the same time, it’s a rule, so you have to change the helmet,” Bell said to Newsday. “I changed my helmet my second year (with the Steelers), and I’ve been playing with a certain helmet my whole career. It was hard to do, but I knew this was coming eventually, so I might as well change my helmet now.”

Le’V a voice of reason? These are strange times, indeed.


I bet this will come in handy

Returners love this drill. The Steelers players do it every day at Saint Vincent College.

This guy did it better than most.

This is the football equivalent of “how many cookies can you fit in your mouth at once.”

Watch SMU captain James Proche catch — and hold — seven punts in a row.

I have no idea what practical purpose this serves. But I suppose if SMU’s defense holds the opposing offense to a seventh-straight punt, while the other six are still airborne, Proche is your guy.

I’m sure folks at the combine will turn this into a new drill that will impact draft slotting.


Mountaineer moving on

Former West Virginia receiver Kevin White is looking for a third team to give him a shot.

As the seventh pick in the 2015 draft, White washed out in Chicago. Leg and shoulder injuries ruined his career. White played in just 14 games in four seasons with the Bears. Via ESPN and Elias Sports Bureau research, “That was third-fewest by any player drafted in the top 10 from 1970 to 2015.”

White tried to latch on with the Arizona Cardinals this offseason, but he was released Wednesday.


Welcome back Brass’

Former Penguins disappointment Derick Brassard is back in the division. He has signed with the New York Islanders.

It’s a one-year deal worth $1.2 million.

Brassard says he wants to “get back to his old self” after being traded twice last season.

That would’ve been nice if he had ever found his “old self” while he was here. Since being traded to the Florida Panthers during last season, Brassard also was dealt to the Colorado Avalanche.

“In Pittsburgh, it wasn’t the right fit for me,” Brassard said on NHL.com. “And then I was kind of bouncing around. I felt like it was really hard to get going.”

Yeah. Tell me about it.


Hart of the decade

ESPN created a decade-long awards list for the 2010’s.

Guess who won the Hart Trophy for the decade on their ballot.

Penguins captain Sidney Crosby was given the nod over Alex Ovechkin and Patrick Kane.

Here is the explanation from author Emily Kaplan, “No player has accumulated more points since 2009-10 than Sidney Crosby’s 922 (Alex Ovechkin is second, with 901). Perhaps more impressive is Crosby’s 1.26 points per game, which is topped by only Connor McDavid’s 1.30. McDavid’s smaller sample (just 287 games) keeps him off the list.”

No other Penguins received nominations for the other awards.

Tim Benz is a Tribune-Review staff writer. You can contact Tim at [email protected] or via Twitter. All tweets could be reposted. All emails are subject to publication unless specified otherwise.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.