First call: Previewing Penguins-Rangers; support for Tom Izzo | TribLIVE.com
Breakfast With Benz

First call: Previewing Penguins-Rangers; support for Tom Izzo

Tim Benz
930823_web1_AP_19048716499405
AP
The Penguins’ Sidney Crosby can’t get a shot past Rangers goaltender Alexandar Georgiev with Marc Staal defending during the second period Feb. 17, 2019, at PPG Paints Arena.

In Monday’s “First Call,” we give you a preview of Monday’s Penguins-Rangers game, a look at the weekend’s impact on the NHL’s Eastern Conference standings, some support for Tom Izzo and some height perspective on UCF’s Tacko Fall.


Wrecked Rangers

The Penguins get back into action Monday night against the Rangers at Madison Square Garden.

New York managed to squeak out a 2-1 victory against the Maple Leafs on Saturday in overtime.

The Rangers have 71 points, the second-lowest point total in the Metropolitan Division.

New York has lost 11 of 13. But five of those games have been in overtime or shootouts, and seven of them have been one-goal decisions.

The Rangers are allowing 3.26 goals against per game. That’s the eighth-highest total in hockey. And their penalty kill of 78.8 is 26th in the NHL out of 31 teams.


No help

While the Penguins were idle Sunday, they got no help in the Eastern Conference playoff race.

The Flyers lost in Washington, 3-1. The Islanders shut out the Coyotes, 2-0. Columbus blanked Vancouver, 5-0. And the Hurricanes got a 2-1 overtime win at home against the Canadiens.

So, with the exception of Montreal, that means all the teams around the Penguins in the conference picked up two points on them in the standings.

For now, the Penguins are three points behind the Capitals for the Metro Division lead and two points behind the Islanders for second place.

The team’s 93 points are still two better than wild-card-leading Carolina’s 91 and five better than the Canadiens for the final playoff slot. The Blue Jackets are currently in ninth place, on the outside of the bracket, with 86 points.


Bravo, Scott

You might have seen the finger-wagging or read the pearl-clutching over the weekend about how Michigan State coach Tom Izzo yelled at one of his players too much during his team’s opening-round NCAA Tournament win against Bradley.

Well thank goodness for ESPNโ€™s Scott Van Pelt who balanced things out.

ESPN isn’t exactly known for this kind of commentary often. Usually the network drifts to the touchy-feely, holier-than-thou side of these debates.

I was glad to see Van Pelt bring some common sense to the discussion.


Whoโ€™s this little guy?

The talk of the NCAA Tournament has been UCF center Tacko Fall. He’s 7 feet, 6 inches tall. His team lost to Duke, 77-76, Sunday in what is largely being called the game of the tournament.

Fall is so big, he makes Blue Devils star Zion Williamson look tiny.

Let me take that back. He even made Kareem-Abdul Jabbar look tiny.

Fall ended up with 15 points, six rebounds, and three blocks.


I donโ€™t have much. Give me this.

With my alma mater, Syracuse, getting bounced from the NCAA Tournament in the first round, it’s a sad time for me.

So I’m going to cling to this: The Orange have recruited a Lemieux!

I can’t seem to find a family connection to Mario, but I’m just going to assume championships will follow his name. Kevin is a 2020 recruit. And he’s a defensive lineman. Usually, offensive linemen have No. 66. But, in this case, I think an exception should be made.

Tim Benz is a Tribune-Review staff writer. You can contact Tim at [email protected] or via Twitter. All tweets could be reposted. All emails are subject to publication unless specified otherwise.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.