First Call: Sir Charles loves Sir Sidney, Mike Rupp eats his shoe | TribLIVE.com
Breakfast With Benz

First Call: Sir Charles loves Sir Sidney, Mike Rupp eats his shoe

Tim Benz
1287445_web1_ptr-Barkley-061419
AP
Former NBA star Charles Barkley spent the first intermission of Game 7 of the Stanley Cup Final talking about how great of a hockey player Sidney Crosby is.

In Thursday’s “First Call,” Charles Barkley loves him some Sidney Crosby! Mike Rupp eats his shoe. And Jenna Fischer has the last laugh.


Sir Charles on Sir Sidney

For reasons still unknown, the NBC hockey crew decided it would spend the first intermission of Game 7 of the Stanley Cup Final talking to former NBA star Charles Barkley.

Perhaps they thought because Charles knows how to breakdown Klay Thompson’s work in the corner, he could elaborate on Patrice Bergeron’s work in the corner.

Penguins fans who were watching the game were probably dubious at first. But the “Round Mound of Zamboni” won them over with one particular comment.

Barkley was asked by NBC’s Keith Jones, “If Raptors star Kawhi Leonard was an NHL superstar, who would he be?”

Sir Charles said Sidney Crosby. Then, he launched into this love note to Sid.

Like Barkley said, he might not be allowed back in Philadelphia ever again after that take.


Ketchup or mustard with that?

Former Penguin turned NHL analyst Mike Rupp said that he’d eat his own shoe if the Blues won the Stanley Cup.

Well, last night, they did. The final score was 4-1, St. Louis over the Bruins in Game 7.

Well, Rupper is a man of his own word.

I didn’t stay awake through the whole NHL post-game show, but I’m gonna assume he only chewed his way through one of the two shoes.


John and Jenna

The Stanley Cup rivalry within the rivalry continued last night.

You know, the one from “The Office.”

Bruins fan John Krasinski invited David Denman from the show to the game as a way to taunt Blues fan Jenna Fischer.

Denman played “Roy,” who was the estranged fiancé of Fischer’s “Pam” character on the show.

But Fischer had the last laugh once the Blues won.

No word on who Dwight was rooting for. He strikes me as more of a quidditch fan than anything.


Phew!

It looks like the St. Louis Post Dispatch is off the hook.

As you may have seen, the paper accidentally posted some congratulations to the Blues before they won the Cup.

Instead, St. Louis actually lost to the Bruins in Game 6.

What a jinx. That one would’ve haunted the paper for a long time had the Bruins won Game 7.

But the Blues won and bailed them out. So all those ads can run now.

That’s not going to stop people from still taking a few jabs.

“Breaking news: First! Guaranteed.”


All that just to lose?

Astros starter Justin Verlander had 15 strikeouts last night.

In fact, he and five other Astros pitchers totaled 24 Ks of Milwaukee hitters.

But the Brewers still won 6-3. It was a 14-inning game. And Brewers pitchers racked up 14 strikeouts of their own.

Verlander had 125 strikeouts on the season. He trails only Gerrit Cole (130) and Max Scherzer (126) for the Major League lead.

Tim Benz is a Tribune-Review staff writer. You can contact Tim at [email protected] or via Twitter. All tweets could be reposted. All emails are subject to publication unless specified otherwise.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.