First Call: Would Steelers trade Artie Burns?; Eddie Olczyk takes a jab at Pirates | TribLIVE.com
Breakfast With Benz

First Call: Would Steelers trade Artie Burns?; Eddie Olczyk takes a jab at Pirates

Tim Benz
1849218_web1_AP_19252676846479
AP
Pittsburgh Steelers cornerbacks Artie Burns, left, and Joe Haden watch from the sideline in the first half of an NFL football game against the New England Patriots, Sunday, Sept. 8, 2019, in Foxborough, Mass.

In Thursday’s “First Call,” the “Trump Ump” has local ties. Artie Burns is a potential trade target. And even Eddie Olczyk takes a jab at the Pirates during a hockey broadcast.


Why bother?

NFL.com has a list of trade ideas for each team before the deadline hits on Oct. 29.

The idea for the Steelers is to sell Artie Burns to a cornerback-hungry team in exchange for a sixth-round pick.

Ok. Maybe. But I wouldn’t.

For as much as Burns has been a bust as a first-round draft choice, he’s better caliber than a sixth-round pick.

If I’m general manager Kevin Colbert, I hold onto Burns because he’s been slightly better in a more limited role this year. Also, he can play special teams, and he’s not going to kill you at cornerback any worse for the rest of this season than someone else of the same reputation.

What if Joe Haden, Steven Nelson, Mike Hilton and Cameron Sutton all got hurt in front of him? I’d still take Burns over a street free agent or another untested rookie.


I never saw this coming

Here’s a runaway winner for “Most Obvious Headline of the Year.”

Really. No kiddin’? The Yankees are going to be in the bidding for the likely American League Cy Young Award winner once he hits the open market?

I’m shocked!

Here’s a headline for a story I’ll be writing for TribLive: “Pirates Unlikely to Reacquire Cole in Free Agency.”

Too bold?


The Russian judges give it an 8

Superstar United States Olympian gymnast Simone Biles threw out the first pitch before Game 2 of the World Series.

OK. But why not do that while throwing the ball? Then I’d be really impressed.

Also, what’s her xFIP?


From the top rope!

Everybody is piling on the Pittsburgh Pirates these days. And why not?

If you lose 93 games, that’s going to happen. But this one probably hit close to home.

During NBC’s Penguins broadcast Wednesday night, play-by-play man Mike “Doc” Emrick took a good-natured swipe at color commentator Ed Olczyk’s 3-3 Chicago Bears.

Olczyk, a former Penguins coach, couldn’t help but respond by jabbing back at Doc’s beloved Buccos.

That hurts, Edzo. That hurts.


Trump Ump

It turns out that the “Trump Ump” has local ties.

MLB umpire Rob Drake made national news when he tweeted “I will be buying an AR-15 tomorrow, because if you impeach MY PRESIDENT this way, YOU WILL HAVE ANOTHER CIVAL WAR!!! #MAGA2020”

Well, be proud, Indiana, Pa. Because the “CIVAL WAR” guy is from your town. He was born there in 1969.

I don’t take his AR-15 threat seriously, though. Because if he can’t spell “Civil War” right, then I expect that he won’t be smart enough to load it.

Top Sports Videos

Tim Benz is a Tribune-Review staff writer. You can contact Tim at [email protected] or via Twitter. All tweets could be reposted. All emails are subject to publication unless specified otherwise.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.